Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Zeta - Facial Harmony Analysis

Creator - looksmaxxing on TikTok and Instagram

Zeta is strongest through the jaw and the upper lip, with a clean jaw-to-neck line, a chin that carries forward and a nose set at the right angle to the face. Below and around the eyes it loses the thread, with a short lower face under a long chin, a lower lip pushed past the line and round eyes on a hard upward tilt.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Dutch
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.7 / 10
Zeta front portrait
Zeta side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Zeta's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.8

out of 10

Top 8.8%

Side view

6.6

out of 10

Top 13%

Best looking out of 10 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.8/ 10 harmony
Zeta front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.77%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.14%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.09%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

8.8 / 10

Face width to height1.92

Ideal 1.96 to 2

8.0
Bitemporal width91.06%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.96

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
6.2
Cheekbone height89.15%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.7 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt12.3 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.58

Ideal 0 to 0.45

9.7
Eye aspect ratio2.41

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio45.70%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

10.0
One eye apart test1.12

Ideal 0.95 to 1

2.9
Eyebrow tilt7.9 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.57

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

0.0

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle75.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA10.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.11

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.18

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.9
Nose tip position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.6
Chin to philtrum ratio2.84

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.72

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.31

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.84

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.36

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

8.1
Mouth corner position1.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.60%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

8.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.6 / 10

Jaw slope144.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

8.3
Bigonial width90.33%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion28.83%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle85.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Neck width90.39%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.7

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.6/ 10 harmony
Zeta side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination21.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle123.6 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope7.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

5.7 / 10

Z angle84.7 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.7
Total facial convexity152.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

6.8
Orbital vector1.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)175.5 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.9
Anterior facial depth60.6 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

3.1
Facial convexity (nasion)172.2 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.77

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection48.7 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

8.1

Nose

7.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.84

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.93

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle85.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

7.3
Nasal tip angle137.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle132.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.8
Nasofacial angle32.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation25.5 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

4.3
Mid nose projection-1.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle43.1 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

6.1

Lips

6.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-5.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)0.0 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

8.7
Upper lip (S-line)-0.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)3.8 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)5.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

8.4
Holdaway H line3.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

8.2 / 10

Mentolabial angle134.2 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

6.6
Recession relative to Frankfort9.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle126.4 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

2.4
Mandibular plane angle14.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.62

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line22.9 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle100.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye spacing

10.0

This contributes to a balanced midface due to the eyes sitting neither too close together nor too far apart.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.36

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.32

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.29

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Excessive canthal tilt

-0.28

The outer eye corners sit unusually high, which can read exaggerated.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.25

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.