Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Yael Shelbia - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and actor - TC Candler's Most Beautiful Face 2020, Palmach, Castro, Renuar

Yael Shelbia's lower face carries her: a chin that sits well forward, a jaw that cuts hard away from the neck, and lips that sit right on the line from nose tip to chin under a short, gently upturned nose. The upper face is looser, with a forehead that slopes back hard, wide temples over a midface that does not carry far forward, and round eyes rather than almond ones.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Israeli Jewish
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.4 / 10
Yael Shelbia front portrait
Yael Shelbia side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Yael Shelbia's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

9.1

out of 10

Top 0.001%

Side view

7.4

out of 10

Top 2.2%

Best looking out of 6,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

9.1/ 10 harmony
Yael Shelbia front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third33.30%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third34.83%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.9
Lower third31.87%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

5.9 / 10

Face width to height1.78

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width92.46%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.02

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
9.5
Cheekbone height89.88%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.6 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.9 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.67

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.28

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio47.74%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.9
One eye apart test0.95

Ideal 0.95 to 1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt12.4 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.67

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

9.9 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle86.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA0.9 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

10.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.12

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.09

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.5
Nose tip position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

9.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.33

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.45

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.5
Lip fullness0.37

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.82

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

8.2
Mouth to nose width1.51

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

9.9
Mouth corner position1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.9 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.03%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

10.0 / 10

Jaw slope144.6 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.9
Bigonial width87.10%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion33.69%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

9.9
Jaw frontal angle85.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Neck width79.73%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.4/ 10 harmony
Yael Shelbia side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.0 / 10

Browridge inclination29.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle134.5 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

5.0
Upper forehead slope9.4 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

6.7 / 10

Z angle81.1 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.4
Total facial convexity140.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.4 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

8.2
Facial convexity (glabella)165.4 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

6.4
Anterior facial depth53.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

0.0
Facial convexity (nasion)162.2 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.54

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection51.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.3

Nose

7.9 / 10

Nasal width to height0.70

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.69

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

6.0
Nasolabial angle99.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle138.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle125.0 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.5
Nasofacial angle35.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation35.4 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

3.1
Mid nose projection1.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

2.7
Frankfort tip angle46.6 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

9.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.2 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.9 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

9.2
Lower lip (S-line)1.3 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

7.9
Upper lip (E-line)4.0 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)3.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle128.9 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort8.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle116.2 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

9.3
Mandibular plane angle12.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.66

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line22.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle98.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal intercanthal spacing

10.0

This contributes to eye-area harmony due to close to one eye-width of space between the eyes.

One eye apart test (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeSide view

Receding forehead

-0.27

The forehead leans back strongly, which can weaken the upper profile.

Browridge inclination (side view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.23

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.19

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Overprojected midface

-0.18

The nose base carries far forward of the ear, beyond the reference range.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.17

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.