Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Yael Shelbia - Facial Harmony Analysis
Model and actor - TC Candler's Most Beautiful Face 2020, Palmach, Castro, Renuar
Yael Shelbia's lower face carries her: a chin that sits well forward, a jaw that cuts hard away from the neck, and lips that sit right on the line from nose tip to chin under a short, gently upturned nose. The upper face is looser, with a forehead that slopes back hard, wide temples over a midface that does not carry far forward, and round eyes rather than almond ones.
- Gender:
- Female
- Ethnicity:
- Israeli Jewish
- Eyes:
- Blue
- Harmony:
- 8.4 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Yael Shelbia's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
8.4
out of 10
Top 0.02%
Front view
9.1
out of 10
Top 0.001%
Side view
7.4
out of 10
Top 2.2%
Best looking out of 6,000 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
10.0 / 10
Face shape
5.9 / 10
Eyes and brows
8.6 / 10
Nose
9.9 / 10
Mouth and lips
9.7 / 10
Ears
9.9 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
10.0 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
5.0 / 10
Profile convexity
6.7 / 10
Nose
7.9 / 10
Lips
9.6 / 10
Chin and jaw
8.4 / 10
Neck
10.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal ear set
10.0This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.
Ear protrusion ratio (front view)
Matched midface and jaw lines
10.0This contributes to overall harmony due to the midface and jaw tapering along nearly the same lines.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Ideal chin position
10.0This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.
Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)
Ideal profile convexity at the nasion
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to nasal root, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.
Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)
Ideal upper lip position (Burstone)
10.0This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.
Upper lip (Burstone) (side view)
Ideal jaw corner height
10.0This contributes to a defined jawline due to the jaw corner sitting at a classical height against the mouth.
Gonion to mouth line (side view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Receding forehead
-0.27The forehead leans back strongly, which can weaken the upper profile.
Browridge inclination (side view)
Narrow midface
-0.23The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Wide forehead
-0.19The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.
Bitemporal width (front view)
Overprojected midface
-0.18The nose base carries far forward of the ear, beyond the reference range.
Anterior facial depth (side view)
Round eyes
-0.17The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.
Eye aspect ratio (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Yael Shelbia's strongest and weakest features
Yael Shelbia scores 8.42 overall, and her front clearly outscores her profile: 9.08 front against 7.35 side, with 32 metrics in band. Her front is close to ideal throughout, and her costs come mostly from the forehead and the depth of the profile.
From the front, her upper and lower thirds are in band and her cheekbones sit high. Her eye area is strong: her outer eye corners tilt correctly, her eyes are spaced correctly for their length, and her brows are set low, tilted correctly and the right length for the face. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is ideal and matches her jaw angle, as the ideal asks. Her chin is in proportion to her philtrum, her lips are full, her mouth corners sit well, her ears sit flat, and her bigonial width and neck width are ideal. In profile, her facial convexity is in band, her nose angles are ideal, her lips sit on the Burstone, E-line and Holdaway references, her chin sits at the right depth, and her mentolabial angle, rear jaw length, jaw corner height and submental angle are all ideal.
Her largest cost is a forehead that leans back from the brow, at 29.8 degrees where 15 to 22 is ideal, which is her weakest single metric at 0.99 out of 10. Her midface reads long for the width of her cheekbones, at 1.78 against 1.94 to 1.98, and her temples are wide, at 92.5% of her cheekbone width against 80.1 to 85.7%. Her eye openings read round, at an aspect ratio of 2.28 against 2.77 to 3.36. In profile, her face is deep for its height, at 1.54 against 1.3 to 1.44, and the angle at her ear between her lower eyelid and her nose base is narrow, at 53.3 degrees against 64.5 to 67.5.