Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Victoria Beckham - Facial Harmony Analysis

Singer and fashion designer - Spice Girls, Victoria Beckham label

Victoria Beckham has high cheekbones, brows set low over eyes spaced exactly one apart, well-balanced lips, ears flat to the head and a jaw that cuts clean into the neck. The lower face and the profile are where it gives, with a long lower third under a short chin, wide temples over a blunt jaw corner, eyes on little tilt, and a nose that projects far ahead of lips set well back behind the line.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
British
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.4 / 10
Victoria Beckham front portrait
Victoria Beckham side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Victoria Beckham's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.6

out of 10

Top 12%

Side view

6.1

out of 10

Top 26%

Best looking out of 6 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.6/ 10 harmony
Victoria Beckham front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

5.9 / 10

Top third32.45%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third31.11%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

7.6
Lower third36.43%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

5.4 / 10

Face width to height1.84

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.2
Bitemporal width91.63%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio0.98

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

6.6
10.0
Cheekbone height88.86%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.3 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

0.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.89

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.70

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

9.7
Eye separation ratio44.41%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

2.0
One eye apart test1.00

Ideal 0.95 to 1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt9.3 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

9.4
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

7.1 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle91.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA11.3 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.13

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.08

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.6
Nose tip position-0.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

5.9

Mouth and lips

7.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

8.1
Chin to philtrum ratio1.83

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

1.4
Lower to upper lip ratio1.72

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.86

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

4.0
Mouth to nose width1.51

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

9.8
Mouth corner position1.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

8.6 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio6.93%

Ideal 8 to 12

7.2
Ear protrusion angle10.5 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

4.5 / 10

Jaw slope139.9 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

8.7
Bigonial width81.08%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

6.6
Lower third proportion35.73%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle102.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width83.96%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

7.2

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.1/ 10 harmony
Victoria Beckham side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

2.3 / 10

Browridge inclination24.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle132.1 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.5
Upper forehead slope11.0 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

6.5

Profile convexity

5.9 / 10

Z angle71.1 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.2
Total facial convexity142.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.6 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

7.6
Facial convexity (glabella)162.7 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

0.0
Anterior facial depth64.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)159.4 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

9.2
Facial depth to height1.51

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection56.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle109.3 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle131.7 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle126.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle36.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

7.3
Nose tip rotation40.4 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-2.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.8
Frankfort tip angle49.3 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

8.2

Lips

2.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-8.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

1.3
Lower lip (Burstone)-5.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

1.4
Upper lip (S-line)-4.7 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)-3.6 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)-1.9 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.2
Lower lip (E-line)-2.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

0.0
Holdaway H line-1.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

2.3

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle116.0 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort2.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle123.8 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle16.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.66

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line15.5 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle103.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal intercanthal spacing

10.0

This contributes to eye-area harmony due to close to one eye-width of space between the eyes.

One eye apart test (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.30

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.27

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.23

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeFront view

Low-set mouth

-0.22

The mouth sits low in the lower third, which shortens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Square lower face

-0.20

The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.