Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Valeria Mazza - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Sports Illustrated Swimsuit, Versace, Revlon campaigns

Valeria Mazza runs close to a clean sheet, with evenly split thirds, very high cheekbones, upturned eyes under well-set brows, full lips and a nose and mouth that sit right on the profile line. The little against her sits wide and at the tip, with broad temples, eyes spaced a touch far apart, a pinched nose base under a turned-up tip and a chin that gives a little ground in profile.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Argentine
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.6 / 10
Valeria Mazza front portrait
Valeria Mazza side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Valeria Mazza's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.6

out of 10

Top 0.007%

Side view

8.6

out of 10

Top 0.004%

Best looking out of 20,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.6/ 10 harmony
Valeria Mazza front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third33.59%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third33.91%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third32.50%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

8.0 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

9.9
Bitemporal width90.02%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

1.5
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.4
9.1
Cheekbone height93.31%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.1 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.2 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.78

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.73

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

9.9
Eye separation ratio45.21%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

6.7
One eye apart test1.15

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt11.1 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

5.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle80.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA10.7 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.99

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

5.0
Intercanthal to nasal width0.99

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position1.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

9.3 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.47

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.28

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

5.7
Lip fullness0.42

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.78

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.50

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

9.8
Mouth corner position-0.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

9.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.00%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

8.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.8 / 10

Jaw slope144.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.9
Bigonial width85.50%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion34.14%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

8.8
Jaw frontal angle90.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width79.76%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.6/ 10 harmony
Valeria Mazza side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.3 / 10

Browridge inclination14.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle136.5 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

8.1
Upper forehead slope6.9 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

8.9 / 10

Z angle74.6 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

8.6
Total facial convexity146.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector0.9 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.9
Facial convexity (glabella)164.4 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

3.0
Anterior facial depth62.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.5
Facial convexity (nasion)161.6 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.44

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection58.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.1 / 10

Nasal width to height0.64

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

6.2
Nasal projection0.68

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

7.1
Nasolabial angle115.1 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle135.6 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle33.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation36.9 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle48.2 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.7

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.9 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)-1.0 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)1.3 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

6.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle139.9 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

7.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-2.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

5.8
Gonial angle123.1 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle24.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

7.4
Ramus to mandible ratio0.55

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

8.6
Gonion to mouth line8.3 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

1.8

Neck

6.5 / 10

Submental cervical angle111.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.5

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.23

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.21

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Wide intercanthal spacing

-0.16

There is more than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads wide-set.

One eye apart test (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.13

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.11

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.