Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Tyler Maher - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Calvin Klein, Versace, Moschino runway and campaigns

Tyler Maher is built for the front view, with even thirds under wide temples, high cheekbones, low-set tilted brows and a jaw that holds its width out to a well-proportioned chin, over a nose that sits straight off the brow. The profile is where it gives, with both lips carried forward of the line, a shallow crease beneath the lower lip, a rounded jaw corner and a chin set back, above narrow eye openings and a face built tall for its width.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
British
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
7.4 / 10
Tyler Maher front portrait
Tyler Maher side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Tyler Maher's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.6

out of 10

Top 0.8%

Side view

7.0

out of 10

Top 5.7%

Best looking out of 50 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.6/ 10 harmony
Tyler Maher front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.42%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third32.25%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third36.33%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.1 / 10

Face width to height1.83

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width88.19%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.90

Ideal 0.97 to 1

5.3
10.0
Cheekbone height90.05%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.1 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt10.0 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

2.4
Eyebrow low setedness0.18

Ideal 0 to 0.45

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.41

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio45.39%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.9
One eye apart test0.97

Ideal 0.95 to 1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt10.9 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.5

Nose

4.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle78.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA7.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

2.9
Nose bridge to nose width2.39

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.22

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

8.2
Nose tip position2.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

9.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.38

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.49

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.31

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.85

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.39

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.7
Mouth corner position0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.9 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.89%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.8

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.2 / 10

Jaw slope146.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

3.5
Bigonial width85.33%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

8.5
Lower third proportion32.15%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle85.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Neck width99.53%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.1

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.0/ 10 harmony
Tyler Maher side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.5 / 10

Browridge inclination17.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle120.8 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope3.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

8.4

Profile convexity

5.6 / 10

Z angle89.5 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity143.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector1.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)174.6 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth55.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

0.0
Facial convexity (nasion)170.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.58

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

4.5
Interior midface projection54.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.9 / 10

Nasal width to height0.72

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.71

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

8.6
Nasolabial angle96.9 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle129.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle32.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation26.3 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

2.0
Mid nose projection0.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle39.5 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.7

Lips

5.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.6 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)3.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)7.6 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

3.3
Lower lip (E-line)6.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

5.1
Holdaway H line1.1 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

6.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle143.5 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort14.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle130.1 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.0
Mandibular plane angle19.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.66

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line17.2 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

8.6 / 10

Submental cervical angle110.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

8.6

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.31

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.27

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.25

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.24

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Overprojected midface

-0.21

The nose base carries far forward of the ear, beyond the reference range.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.