Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Travis Scott - Facial Harmony Analysis

Rapper and producer - Sicko Mode, Goosebumps, Astroworld

Travis Scott has a wide, square jaw with sharp corners, high cheekbones, a well-proportioned nose and a chin that projects well in profile. His eyes sit flat with no upward tilt under low, heavy brows, his forehead slopes back into a shallow nose bridge, his lower third runs long, his mouth corners turn down and his ears flare outward.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
African-American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
2.6 / 10
Travis Scott front portrait
Travis Scott side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Travis Scott's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

2.5

out of 10

Bottom 1.2%

Side view

2.8

out of 10

Bottom 3.8%

Worst looking out of 50 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

2.5/ 10 harmony
Travis Scott front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.3 / 10

Top third29.25%

Ideal 30 to 32

8.8
Middle third32.94%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third37.81%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.2

Face shape

4.8 / 10

Face width to height1.66

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width93.40%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Midface ratio1.11

Ideal 0.97 to 1

4.0
0.0
Cheekbone height84.12%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

3.7 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt1.1 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness2.70

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio3.75

Ideal 3 to 3.5

4.6
Eye separation ratio47.74%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

8.2
One eye apart test1.22

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

3.6
Eyebrow tilt1.0 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.67

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.7

Nose

5.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle93.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Deviation of IAA and JFA5.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

8.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.22

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

7.7
Intercanthal to nasal width1.35

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

0.0
Nose tip position-0.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

1.1

Mouth and lips

4.0 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

0.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.23

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.35

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.3
Lip fullness0.63

Ideal 0.297 to 0.443

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.86

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.23

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

0.0
Mouth corner position-2.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

0.0

Ears

0.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio13.86%

Ideal 8 to 12

0.0
Ear protrusion angle18.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.0 / 10

Jaw slope141.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width90.87%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion36.12%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle87.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width97.68%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

2.8/ 10 harmony
Travis Scott side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

0.4 / 10

Browridge inclination31.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

1.2
Nasofrontal angle142.5 deg

Ideal 107.9 to 119.9

0.0
Upper forehead slope13.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

6.5 / 10

Z angle70.0 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity144.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.9 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

3.0
Facial convexity (glabella)164.0 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

0.0
Anterior facial depth68.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.8
Facial convexity (nasion)161.7 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.9
Facial depth to height1.42

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection53.2 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.6 / 10

Nasal width to height0.65

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.64

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

10.0
Nasolabial angle83.9 deg

Ideal 84.4 to 101.4

9.9
Nasal tip angle127.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.9
Nasomental angle131.9 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle32.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation31.4 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.9 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

8.7
Frankfort tip angle47.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

0.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-15.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

0.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-14.1 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.0
Upper lip (S-line)-11.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)-11.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)-8.8 mm

Ideal -0.8 to 3.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)-10.1 mm

Ideal -0.9 to 2.4

0.0
Holdaway H line-4.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

7.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle138.1 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

2.5
Recession relative to Frankfort13.3 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle114.9 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.9
Mandibular plane angle20.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.55

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

4.0
Gonion to mouth line20.6 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle122.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal facial convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.

Total facial convexity (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasal projection

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the tip projecting a classical share of the bridge length.

Nasal projection (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofacial angle

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose lifting off the facial plane at a classical angle.

Nasofacial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw corner

10.0

This contributes to a defined lower face due to the jaw turning at a classical angle.

Jaw slope (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal chin-philtrum balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to chin height and philtrum length sitting in classical proportion.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.62

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.49

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

High-set brows

-0.46

The brows sit high above the eyes, which can read surprised and soften eye-area definition.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.43

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Overfull lips

-0.43

The lips are deep for the width of the mouth, which can read as overfilled.

Lip fullness (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.