Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Tom Holland - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Spider-Man, The Impossible, The Devil All the Time

Tom Holland is built even all the way down, with a well-proportioned forehead and midface, high cheekbones, low-set tilted brows and a nose cut to sit right between them over a jaw that stays clean into the neck. The face loses its edges up close, with ears that carry well away from the head, a short wide frame, a flat midface in profile, a narrow mouth and no crease under the lip.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.5 / 10
Tom Holland front portrait
Tom Holland side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Tom Holland's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 22%

Side view

6.8

out of 10

Top 8.8%

Best looking out of 6 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
Tom Holland front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

8.3 / 10

Top third28.86%

Ideal 30 to 32

6.8
Middle third33.01%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third38.13%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

8.2

Face shape

7.8 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.96 to 2

8.8
Bitemporal width86.34%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Midface ratio0.97

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
0.0
Cheekbone height89.94%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.4 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

1.2
Eyebrow low setedness0.55

Ideal 0 to 0.45

9.8
Eye aspect ratio3.13

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio45.13%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.7
One eye apart test1.34

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt8.9 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.68

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.9

Nose

6.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle86.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Deviation of IAA and JFA8.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.04

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width0.96

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

3.8
Nose tip position2.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

5.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.6
Chin to philtrum ratio2.19

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.21

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

2.9
Lip fullness0.22

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.73

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

1.8
Mouth to nose width1.39

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.5
Mouth corner position2.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

0.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio15.36%

Ideal 8 to 12

0.0
Ear protrusion angle20.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.4 / 10

Jaw slope143.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.9
Bigonial width85.09%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

8.1
Lower third proportion31.31%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle95.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.0
Neck width95.71%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.8/ 10 harmony
Tom Holland side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

7.3 / 10

Browridge inclination21.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle135.2 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

1.9
Upper forehead slope2.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

4.0 / 10

Z angle73.6 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.6
Total facial convexity143.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-3.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)166.0 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

1.4
Anterior facial depth75.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

0.0
Facial convexity (nasion)162.9 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.9
Facial depth to height1.43

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection68.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

8.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.78

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.80

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle102.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle141.6 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

6.9
Nasomental angle129.3 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle33.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation17.9 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle36.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

8.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.3 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.4 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)0.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.4
Upper lip (E-line)3.9 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

1.5

Chin and jaw

6.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle152.2 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-7.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle115.8 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle19.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.69

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line20.9 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle99.4 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal mouth corner position

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant resting expression due to the corners sitting level with or slightly above the mouth line.

Mouth corner position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal facial convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.

Total facial convexity (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically on Burstone's line.

Upper lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin-neck definition

10.0

This contributes to a sharp profile due to a clean separation between chin and neck.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw length

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.

Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.40

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Short, wide face shape

-0.36

The face is short for its width, which can read compact and heavy.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.35

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.34

The ears stand out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Wide intercanthal spacing

-0.27

There is more than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads wide-set.

One eye apart test (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.