Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Tom Brady - Facial Harmony Analysis

Football player - seven-time Super Bowl champion, NFL all-time passing leader

Tom Brady's strength is the middle of the face and the jaw line itself: high cheekbones, upturned eyes, a well-angled nose and a hard jaw corner running under a mouth cut to the nose. The edges let it down, with ears that carry off the head, eyes set close and round rather than long, a long chin over a shallow chin crease and no line between jaw and neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Irish-American
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
5.6 / 10
Tom Brady front portrait
Tom Brady side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Tom Brady's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.2

out of 10

Top 48%

Side view

6.3

out of 10

Top 20%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.2/ 10 harmony
Tom Brady front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

7.4 / 10

Top third33.41%

Ideal 30 to 32

8.0
Middle third29.47%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

4.1
Lower third37.12%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.9

Face shape

9.2 / 10

Face width to height1.96

Ideal 1.96 to 2

9.9
Bitemporal width84.96%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.6
Midface ratio1.00

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
6.5
Cheekbone height88.39%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.3 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.5 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.61

Ideal 0 to 0.45

9.5
Eye aspect ratio2.64

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio44.35%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

7.5
One eye apart test0.87

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt4.3 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

6.9
Brow length to face width0.60

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

3.2

Nose

5.3 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.6
Deviation of IAA and JFA16.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.23

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

6.8
Intercanthal to nasal width1.40

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

0.0
Nose tip position2.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.0 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio3.03

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.18

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

3.6
Lip fullness0.26

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.91

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

8.5
Mouth to nose width1.42

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position3.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.18%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle16.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

4.0 / 10

Jaw slope135.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

3.8
Bigonial width88.69%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion29.09%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle102.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width101.01%

Ideal 92 to 98

6.2

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.3/ 10 harmony
Tom Brady side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

10.0 / 10

Browridge inclination19.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle128.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

9.9
Upper forehead slope2.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

9.9

Profile convexity

6.4 / 10

Z angle85.0 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.2
Total facial convexity147.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.9
Orbital vector-0.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.2
Facial convexity (glabella)178.6 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

2.5
Anterior facial depth64.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)173.1 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.62

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

1.9
Interior midface projection59.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.9 / 10

Nasal width to height0.82

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.85

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle107.2 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle139.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.9
Nasomental angle130.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation26.6 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

1.3
Mid nose projection-0.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle39.3 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.8

Lips

4.8 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.5 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)0.2 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

8.1
Upper lip (S-line)3.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)7.8 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

2.5
Lower lip (E-line)6.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

4.8
Holdaway H line1.7 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

8.2

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle157.9 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort3.3 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle119.2 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle14.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.76

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line33.6 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle141.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal Cupid's bow

10.0

This contributes to a defined upper lip due to a visible but moderate bow.

Cupid's bow depth (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal mouth-to-nose proportion

10.0

This contributes to lower-face harmony due to the mouth being classically wider than the nose base.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal mouth corner position

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant resting expression due to the corners sitting level with or slightly above the mouth line.

Mouth corner position (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.37

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.36

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.35

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.32

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Wide nose

-0.30

The nose base is wide for the space between the eyes, which can dominate the midface.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.