Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Theo James - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The White Lotus, The Gentlemen, Divergent, Sanditon

Theo James' lower face is the strong half: a long flat jawline turning at a sharp corner with a clean line into the neck, a chin that sits forward of the profile with a crisp crease under the lip, lips flush on that profile line and a straight nose over a forward-carrying midface. The weaker half is in the details, with ears that stand off the head, a nose base that flares wide off a narrow bridge, mouth corners that turn down, eyes set close together with a flat tilt and a long chin that carries the mouth high in the lower face.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Greek, Scottish and English
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.6 / 10
Theo James front portrait
Theo James side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Theo James's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.0

out of 10

Bottom 50%

Side view

9.3

out of 10

Top 0.001%

Best looking out of 8 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.0/ 10 harmony
Theo James front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.6 / 10

Top third30.22%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third30.34%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

8.3
Lower third39.45%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

1.7

Face shape

9.7 / 10

Face width to height1.92

Ideal 1.96 to 2

8.7
Bitemporal width88.54%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.97

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
10.0
Cheekbone height82.51%

Ideal 83 to 100

9.9

Eyes and brows

5.7 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.4 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

1.2
Eyebrow low setedness0.90

Ideal 0 to 0.45

5.0
Eye aspect ratio2.86

Ideal 3 to 3.5

8.3
Eye separation ratio42.39%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.0
One eye apart test1.15

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.1
Eyebrow tilt4.1 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

6.5
Brow length to face width0.73

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

10.0

Nose

4.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle86.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Deviation of IAA and JFA14.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.48

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.32

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

0.0
Nose tip position1.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

5.2 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.5
Chin to philtrum ratio2.86

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.15

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

4.9
Lip fullness0.32

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.95

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

3.8
Mouth to nose width1.43

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position-2.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

0.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.44%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle17.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

4.4 / 10

Jaw slope134.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width91.72%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion27.34%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle100.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

1.9
Neck width95.24%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

9.3/ 10 harmony
Theo James side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

10.0 / 10

Browridge inclination18.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle127.4 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope0.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

9.2 / 10

Z angle82.0 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity137.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

8.1
Orbital vector0.4 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.7
Facial convexity (glabella)169.9 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.9
Anterior facial depth65.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)167.4 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.1
Facial depth to height1.55

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

6.5
Interior midface projection59.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.79

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.80

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle108.1 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle133.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle125.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.7
Nasofacial angle36.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.4
Nose tip rotation23.8 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

8.2
Mid nose projection-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle39.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.6

Lips

8.3 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)2.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)6.6 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

8.6
Lower lip (E-line)3.7 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.2

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle126.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort2.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle119.2 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle18.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.75

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line23.7 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle103.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal neck width

10.0

This contributes to a proportionate frame due to the neck sizing well against the jaw.

Neck width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead slope

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.

Browridge inclination (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically on Burstone's line.

Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.42

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.39

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.35

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.33

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.29

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.