Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Theo James - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor - The White Lotus, The Gentlemen, Divergent, Sanditon
Theo James' lower face is the strong half: a long flat jawline turning at a sharp corner with a clean line into the neck, a chin that sits forward of the profile with a crisp crease under the lip, lips flush on that profile line and a straight nose over a forward-carrying midface. The weaker half is in the details, with ears that stand off the head, a nose base that flares wide off a narrow bridge, mouth corners that turn down, eyes set close together with a flat tilt and a long chin that carries the mouth high in the lower face.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- Greek, Scottish and English
- Eyes:
- Brown
- Harmony:
- 6.6 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Theo James's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
6.6
out of 10
Top 13%
Front view
5.0
out of 10
Bottom 50%
Side view
9.3
out of 10
Top 0.001%
Best looking out of 8 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
6.6 / 10
Face shape
9.7 / 10
Eyes and brows
5.7 / 10
Nose
4.0 / 10
Mouth and lips
5.2 / 10
Ears
5.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
4.4 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
10.0 / 10
Profile convexity
9.2 / 10
Nose
8.5 / 10
Lips
8.3 / 10
Chin and jaw
10.0 / 10
Neck
10.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal nose tip definition
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.
Nasal tip angle (side view)
Ideal neck width
10.0This contributes to a proportionate frame due to the neck sizing well against the jaw.
Neck width (front view)
Ideal forehead slope
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.
Browridge inclination (side view)
Ideal jawline slope
10.0This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.
Mandibular plane angle (side view)
Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)
10.0This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.
Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)
Straight nasal bridge
10.0This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.
Mid nose projection (side view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
High-set mouth
-0.42The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.
Lower third proportion (front view)
Protruding ears
-0.39The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion angle (front view)
Flared nose base
-0.35The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.
Nose bridge to nose width (front view)
Midface-jaw mismatch
-0.33The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Long chin or short philtrum
-0.29The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.
Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Theo James's strongest and weakest features
Theo James scores 6.61 overall, and his profile far outscores his front: 9.31 side against 4.95 front. His profile is close to ideal across the board, and his costs come from the front: a short upper lip, his ears, a narrow nose bridge, the jaw angle, a long chin and downturned mouth corners.
From the front, his upper third, temples and midface ratio are in band, and his full face is ideally proportioned for its width. His brows run the right length for his face, and his nose tip sits level with his nostrils. His lips are full, his mouth is the right width for his nose, and his neck is the right width. In profile, his forehead leans back from the brow correctly, his upper forehead is in band, and the step from his brow to his nose is in band. His lips sit correctly against his chin by Z angle, his anterior facial depth is in band, and his midface carries his nose base forward correctly. His nose's forward length is in proportion to its height, and his nasolabial angle, tip angle and mid nose projection are ideal. Both lips sit on the Burstone references, and his lower lip sits on the S-line and E-line. His chin sits correctly forward, and his mentolabial angle, jaw corner angle, jaw plane, rear jaw length, jaw corner height and jaw-to-neck angle are all ideal.
His largest cost is that his upper lip is short, taking up 27.3% of the lower third against 31 to 33.5%, which is his weakest single metric at 1.14 out of 10 and takes about 0.42 of a point. His ears stand out from his head at 17.6 degrees against 10 to 11.5, and his nose bridge reads narrow against his nostrils, at 2.48 against 2.06 to 2.14. His jaw angle differs from the angle from nose base to outer eye corners by 14.0 degrees, where 2.5 or less is ideal. His chin is long, at 2.86 times his philtrum against 2.15 to 2.45, and his mouth corners turn down, at -2.19 against 0 to 4.