Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Taylor Hill - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Victoria's Secret Angel, Vogue, Chanel campaigns

Taylor Hill has a model's upper face: high cheekbones, low-set tilted brows that stretch the full eye line, and eyes spaced exactly one apart. The softness is all in the tissue, with hollow under-eyes, a rounder eye shape and a long lower face that pulls the balance down.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
7.7 / 10
Taylor Hill front portrait
Taylor Hill side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Taylor Hill's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.2

out of 10

Top 3.1%

Side view

8.5

out of 10

Top 0.009%

Best looking out of 200 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.2/ 10 harmony
Taylor Hill front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

7.8 / 10

Top third33.85%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

9.9
Middle third36.45%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

3.4
Lower third29.70%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

6.9 / 10

Face width to height1.80

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width88.77%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

5.4
Midface ratio1.02

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
9.0
Cheekbone height95.28%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.6 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.60

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.27

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio47.18%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

10.0
One eye apart test1.06

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt14.8 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.73

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

5.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.2
Deviation of IAA and JFA11.3 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.54

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.05

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.9
Nose tip position2.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.0 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

0.0
Chin to philtrum ratio1.93

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

5.5
Lower to upper lip ratio1.45

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.6
Lip fullness0.39

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.78

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.48

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

7.9
Mouth corner position3.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

6.2 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.31%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.0
Ear protrusion angle7.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

3.4

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.5 / 10

Jaw slope140.9 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.6
Bigonial width85.88%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion36.66%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle96.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

7.7
Neck width75.45%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.5/ 10 harmony
Taylor Hill side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

10.0 / 10

Browridge inclination20.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle139.9 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

10.0
Upper forehead slope7.1 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

6.5 / 10

Z angle78.9 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

10.0
Total facial convexity142.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-2.6 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)169.6 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth63.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.8
Facial convexity (nasion)168.2 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.49

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

4.7
Interior midface projection63.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

7.6

Nose

7.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.59

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

0.0
Nasal projection0.61

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

10.0
Nasolabial angle106.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle140.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

8.4
Nasomental angle127.8 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle33.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation35.3 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

3.2
Mid nose projection-2.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.8
Frankfort tip angle47.5 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.9

Lips

9.2 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.4 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

6.3
Lower lip (S-line)0.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)4.0 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)1.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

8.1

Chin and jaw

9.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle128.0 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort0.6 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.8
Gonial angle123.1 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle14.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.3
Ramus to mandible ratio0.77

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.3
Gonion to mouth line19.3 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle101.2 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw width

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.

Bigonial width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofacial angle

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose lifting off the facial plane at a classical angle.

Nasofacial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin-neck definition

10.0

This contributes to a sharp profile due to a clean separation between chin and neck.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically on Burstone's line.

Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin crease

10.0

This contributes to a defined chin due to the lip-chin transition being defined but soft.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Low-set mouth

-0.28

The mouth sits low in the lower third, which shortens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.25

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.25

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Flat Cupid's bow

-0.23

The bow is shallow, which flattens the upper lip's definition.

Cupid's bow depth (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.23

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.