Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Tate McRae - Facial Harmony Analysis
Singer - You Broke Me First, Greedy, Think Later
Tate McRae has an even forehead-to-chin stack, high cheekbones, full lips, a well-shaped nose and a jaw that keeps its taper. The profile is the weak half, with lips and chin that all sit back behind the line, a face narrow for its height, wide temples, close-set eyes with little tilt and flat brows.
- Gender:
- Female
- Ethnicity:
- Caucasian
- Eyes:
- Hazel
- Harmony:
- 6.1 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Tate McRae's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
6.1
out of 10
Top 26%
Front view
5.9
out of 10
Top 31%
Side view
6.4
out of 10
Top 18%
Best looking out of 4 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
9.0 / 10
Face shape
4.1 / 10
Eyes and brows
4.6 / 10
Nose
4.0 / 10
Mouth and lips
7.1 / 10
Ears
9.6 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
8.0 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
8.6 / 10
Profile convexity
6.2 / 10
Nose
8.8 / 10
Lips
3.5 / 10
Chin and jaw
6.8 / 10
Neck
10.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal jaw width
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.
Bigonial width (front view)
Ideal nasolabial angle
10.0This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.
Nasolabial angle (side view)
Ideal forehead slope
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.
Browridge inclination (side view)
Ideal nose proportions
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.
Nasal width to height (side view)
Ideal interior midface projection
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to the midface carrying forward under the eyes at a classical angle.
Interior midface projection (side view)
Ideal lower-third balance
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth sitting a classical third of the way from nose to chin.
Lower third proportion (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Narrow midface
-0.43The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Wide neck
-0.27The neck is wide against the jaw, which can blur the jawline's definition.
Neck width (front view)
Narrow intercanthal spacing
-0.27There is less than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads close-set.
One eye apart test (front view)
Midface-jaw mismatch
-0.25The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Recessed chin
-0.23The chin falls behind the nasion perpendicular, which reads as a weak chin in profile.
Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Tate McRae's strongest and weakest features
Tate McRae scores 6.09 overall, 5.92 front and 6.38 side. Her nose and jaw corner are her strongest features, and her costs come from the length of the midface, the eye spacing and the chin in profile.
From the front, her upper and lower thirds are in band, her cheekbones sit high, and her brows are set low. Her cupid's bow has the right depth and her mouth corners sit well. Her jaw slope, bigonial width and the split of her lower third between lip and chin are ideal, and her ears sit flat. In profile, her brow ridge, facial convexity and facial depth are in band, her nose angles, tip rotation and bridge line are ideal, and her mentolabial angle and rear jaw length are ideal.
Her largest cost is that her midface reads long for the width of her cheekbones, at 1.72 against an ideal of 1.94 to 1.98, which takes about 0.43 of a point. Her neck is wide for her jaw, at 88.8% of jaw width against 72.5 to 81.4%. Her eyes are set close for their length, at 0.96 eye widths apart against 1.05 to 1.1. Her jaw angle and the angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners differ by 10.3 degrees, against an ideal of 0.1 to 1.73. In profile, her chin sits back, at -10.1 against 1.5 to 15, with a Z angle of 66 degrees against 76.6 to 80.