Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Sophia Bush - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - One Tree Hill, Chicago P.D., John Tucker Must Die

Sophia Bush's proportions carry the face: an even split from hairline to chin, high cheekbones, a small straight nose sitting tight to the face and a slim neck under a clean jaw corner. Against that are thin lips on a wide mouth, a midface that sits flat rather than forward, and eyes that sit ahead of the cheek rather than on it, leaving the under-eye unsupported.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
English, Irish, Scottish and Italian
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
6.8 / 10
Sophia Bush front portrait
Sophia Bush side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Sophia Bush's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.4

out of 10

Top 1.7%

Side view

5.7

out of 10

Top 37%

Best looking out of 10 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.4/ 10 harmony
Sophia Bush front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.7 / 10

Top third30.84%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third33.85%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third35.31%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

7.1 / 10

Face width to height1.83

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width88.25%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

6.8
Midface ratio1.00

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.1
9.6
Cheekbone height89.40%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.5 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

7.6
Eyebrow low setedness1.12

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.2
Eye aspect ratio2.86

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

10.0
Eye separation ratio45.63%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

8.6
One eye apart test1.12

Ideal 0.95 to 1

2.3
Eyebrow tilt9.3 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

9.5
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

7.9 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.7
Deviation of IAA and JFA13.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.18

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width0.95

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position0.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

5.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.7
Chin to philtrum ratio2.38

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.75

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.27

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.86

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

3.8
Mouth to nose width1.71

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.0
Mouth corner position2.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.09%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.5 / 10

Jaw slope137.0 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

2.8
Bigonial width88.89%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.9
Lower third proportion31.18%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle98.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.6
Neck width78.98%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.7/ 10 harmony
Sophia Bush side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.6 / 10

Browridge inclination7.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle140.7 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

10.0
Upper forehead slope9.7 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.7

Profile convexity

6.8 / 10

Z angle76.4 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.9
Total facial convexity141.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-4.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)167.5 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

9.9
Anterior facial depth71.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

7.4
Facial convexity (nasion)166.2 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

6.7
Facial depth to height1.35

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection72.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

7.3 / 10

Nasal width to height0.60

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

0.0
Nasal projection0.61

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

10.0
Nasolabial angle111.1 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle128.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.9
Nasomental angle131.8 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.8
Nasofacial angle29.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

5.7
Nose tip rotation23.3 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.6 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle33.6 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

0.4

Lips

7.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.6
Upper lip (S-line)2.0 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.7
Lower lip (S-line)2.6 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)5.4 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

8.9
Lower lip (E-line)4.7 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line1.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

3.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle145.3 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.1
Recession relative to Frankfort-5.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle124.9 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

9.9
Mandibular plane angle26.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

2.2
Ramus to mandible ratio0.51

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

6.3
Gonion to mouth line8.0 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

0.9

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle117.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.28

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.27

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

Wide mouth for the nose

-0.22

The mouth is far wider than the nose base, which can unbalance the two features.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Recessed midface

-0.21

The midface falls away steeply under the eyes, which reads under-projected.

Interior midface projection (side view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.20

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.