Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Sofia Vergara - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Modern Family, Griselda, Hot Pursuit

Sofia Vergara carries the midface, with high cheekbones, upward-tilted eyes under evenly set brows and a full mouth cut to the width of the nose. The bottom of the face softens it, with a long lower third, downturned mouth corners, a lower lip much heavier than the upper and a jaw that widens out instead of turning a corner.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Colombian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.0 / 10
Sofia Vergara front portrait
Sofia Vergara side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Sofia Vergara's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.0

out of 10

Top 6.1%

Side view

7.1

out of 10

Top 4.9%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.0/ 10 harmony
Sofia Vergara front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.5 / 10

Top third32.03%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third31.63%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.5
Lower third36.34%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

9.3 / 10

Face width to height1.89

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

8.2
Bitemporal width87.70%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

8.1
Midface ratio1.03

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

10.0
10.0
Cheekbone height86.65%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.81

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.30

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio45.15%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

6.4
One eye apart test1.04

Ideal 0.95 to 1

9.3
Eyebrow tilt12.8 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

5.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle90.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA11.6 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.41

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

3.4
Intercanthal to nasal width1.14

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

5.4
Nose tip position-0.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

9.8

Mouth and lips

5.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

8.1
Chin to philtrum ratio2.13

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio2.09

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.37

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

1.5
Mouth to nose width1.55

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position-1.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

0.0

Ears

7.5 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.06%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

5.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.8 / 10

Jaw slope135.7 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

0.0
Bigonial width89.62%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

8.8
Lower third proportion32.03%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle102.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width73.43%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.1/ 10 harmony
Sofia Vergara side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination19.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle126.5 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope7.4 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

5.3 / 10

Z angle83.5 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

3.4
Total facial convexity152.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

1.4
Orbital vector0.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.9
Facial convexity (glabella)175.3 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

8.3
Anterior facial depth64.6 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)172.1 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.67

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection52.0 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.6

Nose

7.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.80

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.81

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle93.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

7.4
Nasal tip angle140.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.1
Nasomental angle134.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

3.9
Nasofacial angle30.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation31.8 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.2
Mid nose projection-1.6 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.7
Frankfort tip angle42.2 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

9.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-5.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

8.9
Upper lip (S-line)-0.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)3.6 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

7.8

Chin and jaw

9.9 / 10

Mentolabial angle135.4 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort7.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle126.2 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

9.5
Mandibular plane angle16.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.64

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line20.3 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

9.4 / 10

Submental cervical angle108.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

9.4

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.29

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.27

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.27

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Concave profile

-0.21

The profile runs flat to concave at the nose base, which can read as a prominent chin or flat midface.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.21

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.