Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Seth Rogen - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor and writer - Superbad, Knocked Up, The Studio

Seth Rogen keeps well-tilted eyes, high cheekbones, a chin that carries well forward and a nose set at a good angle in profile. Almost everything around that works against him, with a short forehead over a very long midface, a face far too narrow for its height, round eyes under high downturned brows, very thin lips and no line at all from jaw into neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Canadian Jewish
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
3.5 / 10
Seth Rogen front portrait
Seth Rogen side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Seth Rogen's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

2.2

out of 10

Bottom 0.3%

Side view

5.7

out of 10

Top 37%

Worst looking out of 6 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

2.2/ 10 harmony
Seth Rogen front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third24.85%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.0
Middle third37.70%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

0.0
Lower third37.45%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.8

Face shape

6.2 / 10

Face width to height1.65

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width91.23%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.90

Ideal 0.97 to 1

5.8
5.3
Cheekbone height86.83%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.5 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness1.27

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio2.18

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio43.07%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

1.2
One eye apart test1.04

Ideal 0.95 to 1

9.3
Eyebrow tilt-1.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.7

Nose

2.3 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle81.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA15.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.39

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.30

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

1.5
Nose tip position2.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

4.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.4 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

1.7
Chin to philtrum ratio2.65

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

4.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.22

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

2.6
Lip fullness0.17

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.93

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

6.9
Mouth to nose width1.38

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.1
Mouth corner position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.55%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle10.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.4 / 10

Jaw slope134.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width93.07%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.3
Lower third proportion27.90%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle96.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

7.9
Neck width90.83%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.7/ 10 harmony
Seth Rogen side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

8.5 / 10

Browridge inclination26.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

7.7
Nasofrontal angle125.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope3.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

7.7

Profile convexity

4.6 / 10

Z angle89.4 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity145.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-2.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.4
Facial convexity (glabella)178.1 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

4.5
Anterior facial depth67.6 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)178.5 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.63

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

1.2
Interior midface projection55.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.88

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

8.1
Nasal projection0.92

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle86.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

8.0
Nasal tip angle131.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle33.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation22.4 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

9.8
Mid nose projection-1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle38.6 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

5.1 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.5 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)2.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.5 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)6.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

5.6
Holdaway H line1.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

7.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle141.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort10.6 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle118.7 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle9.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

7.2
Ramus to mandible ratio0.79

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.5
Gonion to mouth line38.2 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle151.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal mouth corner position

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant resting expression due to the corners sitting level with or slightly above the mouth line.

Mouth corner position (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofrontal angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the forehead flowing into the nose at a classical angle.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.64

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.47

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.45

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Short forehead

-0.42

The forehead takes up less of the face than ideal, which can make the lower features read heavy.

Top third (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.41

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.