Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Sam Dezz (Samuel Dezzani) - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and creator - Instagram, TikTok, acting

Sam Dezz is even through the middle, with a well-proportioned midface and lower face, high cheekbones, tilted brows and a nose cut to the eye line. The eye area and the nose angle are the leaks, with no upward tilt, a rounder eye shape, a narrow jaw and a tip that rotates further up than the profile wants.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Italian-American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.6 / 10
Sam Dezz (Samuel Dezzani) front portrait
Sam Dezz (Samuel Dezzani) side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Sam Dezz (Samuel Dezzani)'s facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.7

out of 10

Top 0.7%

Side view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.4%

Best looking out of 100 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.7/ 10 harmony
Sam Dezz (Samuel Dezzani) front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.8 / 10

Top third32.75%

Ideal 30 to 32

9.5
Middle third31.66%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.59%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.5 / 10

Face width to height1.83

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width84.61%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.3
Midface ratio1.04

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.1
8.9
Cheekbone height92.85%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt0.6 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.88

Ideal 0 to 0.45

5.6
Eye aspect ratio2.58

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio47.24%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.7
One eye apart test1.27

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt10.6 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.8

Nose

9.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle88.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA0.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

10.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.02

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.5
Intercanthal to nasal width0.99

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

7.5
Nose tip position2.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

2.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.13

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.94

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.6
Lip fullness0.38

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.7
Interpupillary to mouth width0.84

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.59

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

4.0
Mouth corner position0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

8.4 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio6.13%

Ideal 8 to 12

8.0
Ear protrusion angle8.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

8.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.6 / 10

Jaw slope147.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

1.9
Bigonial width84.17%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

6.2
Lower third proportion32.54%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle88.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width92.32%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
Sam Dezz (Samuel Dezzani) side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination16.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle120.2 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope11.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

9.3 / 10

Z angle78.5 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity137.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

7.4
Orbital vector2.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)169.2 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.7
Anterior facial depth64.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)163.9 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

10.0
Facial depth to height1.54

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

7.1
Interior midface projection53.7 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

5.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.78

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.80

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle103.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle137.6 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle123.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

4.9
Nasofacial angle40.3 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.0
Nose tip rotation34.3 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-0.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle50.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

9.1 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.7 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.5
Upper lip (S-line)-0.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.9
Lower lip (S-line)-1.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

7.9
Upper lip (E-line)2.7 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)0.7 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line-0.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

6.1

Chin and jaw

9.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle128.8 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort5.4 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle113.5 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.0
Mandibular plane angle14.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.72

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line25.7 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle97.9 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower-third balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth sitting a classical third of the way from nose to chin.

Lower third proportion (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw corner height

10.0

This contributes to a defined jawline due to the jaw corner sitting at a classical height against the mouth.

Gonion to mouth line (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.29

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.26

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.23

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

severeSide view

Rounded forehead

-0.22

The forehead bends strongly between brow and hairline, which can read bossed or angled.

Upper forehead slope (side view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.20

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.