Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Roseanne Park - Facial Harmony Analysis

Singer - BLACKPINK, APT., On the Ground, Rosie

Rosé's nose and mouth are the draw, with a straight, well-rotated nose over lips that sit right on the line, above a jaw that keeps its proportions back to the ear. Head-on the face reads narrow for its length, with close-set narrow eye openings, a short midface, a mouth narrow for the nose, a deep-set brow-to-nose junction and a chin that sits behind the rest of the profile.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Korean-New Zealander
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.0 / 10
Roseanne Park front portrait
Roseanne Park side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Roseanne Park's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.6

out of 10

Top 12%

Side view

7.6

out of 10

Top 1%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.6/ 10 harmony
Roseanne Park front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third31.78%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third34.81%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.9
Lower third33.42%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

9.9

Face shape

5.1 / 10

Face width to height1.77

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width88.69%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

5.6
Midface ratio0.90

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

0.0
10.0
Cheekbone height93.73%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.5 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.91

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.14

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio42.19%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test1.13

Ideal 0.95 to 1

1.3
Eyebrow tilt10.0 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

9.9
Brow length to face width0.61

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.0

Nose

6.1 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle80.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA8.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.5
Nose bridge to nose width2.16

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.06

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.9
Nose tip position2.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.0 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.8
Chin to philtrum ratio2.27

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.87

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.39

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.77

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.30

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.0
Mouth corner position3.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.8 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.48%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.3 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.6

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.8 / 10

Jaw slope145.8 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.4
Bigonial width82.64%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.6
Lower third proportion31.81%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle88.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width87.20%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

0.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.6/ 10 harmony
Roseanne Park side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.9 / 10

Browridge inclination20.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle126.5 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope11.4 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

4.8

Profile convexity

6.5 / 10

Z angle82.9 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

5.4
Total facial convexity154.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector-2.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)170.4 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth70.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

8.7
Facial convexity (nasion)164.4 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

9.9
Facial depth to height1.47

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

8.5
Interior midface projection61.2 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.8

Nose

8.9 / 10

Nasal width to height0.67

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.65

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

9.3
Nasolabial angle99.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle134.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

3.7
Nasofacial angle30.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation33.2 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

7.4
Mid nose projection-0.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.0 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

9.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.0 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

8.7
Lower lip (S-line)-0.6 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)4.1 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)1.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

4.2

Chin and jaw

7.1 / 10

Mentolabial angle146.2 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort6.8 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle129.5 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

2.8
Mandibular plane angle22.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.69

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line15.5 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

4.1 / 10

Submental cervical angle86.9 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

4.1

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.34

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.33

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Close-set eyes

-0.31

The eyes sit close together for the width of the face, which can pinch the midface.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.28

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.26

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.