Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Romulus - Facial Harmony Analysis

Looksmaxxing creator - TikTok facial analysis

Romulus has the jaw for it: a sharp corner, a hard line from jaw to neck, and lips that sit right on the line from nose tip to chin. The middle of the face is where it loosens, with ears that stand off the head, eyes set wide with hollow support under them, a nose that flares at the base off a soft root, and a chin set back in profile.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.1 / 10
Romulus front portrait
Romulus side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Romulus's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.08%

Side view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.08%

Best looking out of 1,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
Romulus front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.5 / 10

Top third29.34%

Ideal 30 to 32

9.1
Middle third33.00%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third37.65%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.5

Face shape

7.3 / 10

Face width to height1.81

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width91.19%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
6.6
Cheekbone height84.47%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.4 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

9.6
Eyebrow low setedness0.75

Ideal 0 to 0.45

7.9
Eye aspect ratio2.96

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio48.53%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

3.8
One eye apart test1.22

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

3.6
Eyebrow tilt11.0 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.9
Brow length to face width0.69

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

10.0

Nose

8.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA2.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

9.9
Nose bridge to nose width2.31

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.2
Intercanthal to nasal width1.10

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position1.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.08

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.5
Lower to upper lip ratio1.57

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.33

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.76

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

6.0
Mouth to nose width1.33

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

5.0
Mouth corner position1.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.82%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle15.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.4 / 10

Jaw slope143.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.9
Bigonial width87.79%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion34.04%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

7.2
Jaw frontal angle89.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width90.46%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.7

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
Romulus side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination20.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle138.4 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope2.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

9.9

Profile convexity

6.7 / 10

Z angle77.8 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.9
Total facial convexity141.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-3.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)173.4 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth67.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)171.6 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.48

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.7
Interior midface projection63.7 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

3.7

Nose

7.9 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.9
Nasolabial angle104.2 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle132.5 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle32.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation28.8 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle38.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

9.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.6 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.8
Lower lip (S-line)0.6 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)5.5 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)3.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.7

Chin and jaw

8.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle130.7 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.2
Recession relative to Frankfort-4.3 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

3.8
Gonial angle115.7 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle17.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line17.6 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle105.7 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting just below the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofacial angle

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose lifting off the facial plane at a classical angle.

Nasofacial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower face taper

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jawlines tapering at a classical angle.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (S-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting on Steiner's S-line.

Lower lip (S-line) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.29

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.23

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.16

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.15

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

severeSide view

Flat nasal root

-0.14

The transition from forehead to nose is shallow, which flattens the profile at the root.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Romulus's strongest and weakest features

Romulus scores 8.14 overall, with an identical front and side (8.14 each) and 31 metrics in band. His face is balanced throughout, and his costs are mild, with no metric scoring below 4.02.

From the front, his middle third and temples are in band and his cheekbones sit high. His brows are the right length for the face. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is ideal, and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His lips are full and sized correctly to each other, and his mouth corners sit well. His bigonial width and the angle where the two sides of his jaw meet are ideal. In profile, his brow ridge and facial convexity are in band, his nose angles and bridge line are ideal, his lips sit on the Burstone, S-line and E-line references, and his jaw corner angle, jaw plane, jaw corner height and submental angle are all ideal, so his jaw meets his neck at a clean angle.

His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.81 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.29 of a point. His ears are angled out at 15.1 degrees against 10 to 11.5, and his nose bridge reads narrow against the width of his nostrils, at 2.31 against 2.06 to 2.14. In profile, his nose tip is rotated upward at 28.8 degrees against 11.5 to 21.5, the step from his brow to his nose is shallow, at 138.4 degrees against 116 to 128, and his profile is flatter than ideal, measured at the nose base, at 171.6 degrees against 163 to 166.