Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Pedro Pascal - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The Last of Us, The Mandalorian, Game of Thrones

The thirds stack evenly, the eye openings are long rather than round, the ears sit flat, and the chin projects well forward off a strong jaw corner. A very flat profile with the nose held close to the face over a heavy bridge, flat brows with little eye tilt, thin lips sitting ahead of the chin, and a jaw that slopes into a narrow front are the limits.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Chilean
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
5.1 / 10
Pedro Pascal front portrait
Pedro Pascal side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Pedro Pascal's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.4

out of 10

Top 45%

Side view

4.6

out of 10

Bottom 44%

Best looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.4/ 10 harmony
Pedro Pascal front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third30.09%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third33.00%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third36.91%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

6.2 / 10

Face width to height1.89

Ideal 1.96 to 2

3.9
Bitemporal width94.66%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.3
Midface ratio1.06

Ideal 0.97 to 1

7.8
0.0
Cheekbone height82.63%

Ideal 83 to 100

9.9

Eyes and brows

5.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt2.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.96

Ideal 0 to 0.45

3.7
Eye aspect ratio3.20

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio47.66%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

8.5
One eye apart test1.08

Ideal 0.95 to 1

6.4
Eyebrow tilt1.5 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.7

Nose

8.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle90.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA13.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.12

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.18

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.9
Nose tip position2.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

4.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

3.4
Chin to philtrum ratio2.52

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.3
Lower to upper lip ratio2.12

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

5.6
Lip fullness0.25

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.75

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

4.5
Mouth to nose width1.23

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

0.0
Mouth corner position-0.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

8.6

Ears

7.1 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.21%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.3 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

4.3

Jaw, neck and lower face

2.9 / 10

Jaw slope131.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width93.71%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

8.5
Lower third proportion29.08%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle103.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width86.90%

Ideal 92 to 98

6.1

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.6/ 10 harmony
Pedro Pascal side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.2 / 10

Browridge inclination19.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle137.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope4.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

5.6

Profile convexity

5.6 / 10

Z angle89.6 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity155.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

3.8
Orbital vector0.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.6
Facial convexity (glabella)177.5 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

6.3
Anterior facial depth65.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)178.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.58

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

5.0
Interior midface projection56.2 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

5.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.65

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

9.9
Nasal projection0.67

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

9.9
Nasolabial angle94.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle153.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

0.0
Nasomental angle145.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

0.0
Nasofacial angle22.3 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.0
Nose tip rotation18.8 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection3.3 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

0.0
Frankfort tip angle31.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

6.3 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)0.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

6.6
Upper lip (S-line)2.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

3.5
Lower lip (S-line)3.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)6.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.8
Lower lip (E-line)6.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

7.0
Holdaway H line1.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

7.1

Chin and jaw

8.2 / 10

Mentolabial angle140.4 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort5.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle119.5 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle13.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.7
Ramus to mandible ratio0.60

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.7
Gonion to mouth line22.0 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle118.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.32

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.31

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Concave profile

-0.29

The profile runs flat to concave at the nose base, which can read as a prominent chin or flat midface.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

severeFront view

Overly sharp jaw corner

-0.28

The jaw turns more sharply than the reference range, which can read harsh.

Jaw slope (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.28

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.