Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Paul Rudd - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Clueless, Anchorman, Ant-Man

Paul Rudd has high cheekbones, a defined cupid's bow, a chin in proportion to his upper lip and a balanced side profile with a straight nose and lips that sit right on the nose-to-chin line. His face runs long and narrow, his lips are thin, his eyes are round and set wide, his brows sit flat and his jaw-to-neck line is soft.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
American Jewish
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
6.9 / 10
Paul Rudd front portrait
Paul Rudd side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Paul Rudd's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 22%

Side view

8.0

out of 10

Top 0.2%

Best looking out of 10 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
Paul Rudd front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.0 / 10

Top third33.70%

Ideal 30 to 32

7.0
Middle third31.73%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third34.58%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

4.9 / 10

Face width to height1.63

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width86.88%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.89

Ideal 0.97 to 1

4.7
0.0
Cheekbone height86.58%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.6 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

7.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.82

Ideal 0 to 0.45

6.6
Eye aspect ratio2.66

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.4
Eye separation ratio46.54%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

10.0
One eye apart test1.26

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt3.3 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

3.9
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.3

Nose

7.5 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle81.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA2.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

9.9
Nose bridge to nose width2.23

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

7.3
Intercanthal to nasal width1.05

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position2.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.3 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.3 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.21

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.17

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

4.3
Lip fullness0.25

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.56

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

6.8
Mouth corner position0.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

7.3 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.56%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

4.7

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.9 / 10

Jaw slope143.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.3
Bigonial width88.29%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion31.22%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle84.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.7
Neck width87.04%

Ideal 92 to 98

6.3

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.0/ 10 harmony
Paul Rudd side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.3 / 10

Browridge inclination19.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle138.0 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope3.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

8.8

Profile convexity

7.0 / 10

Z angle77.4 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.9
Total facial convexity144.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

3.4
Facial convexity (glabella)164.1 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

0.0
Anterior facial depth66.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)163.1 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

10.0
Facial depth to height1.61

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

2.8
Interior midface projection51.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.9

Nose

9.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.71

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

5.1
Nasolabial angle105.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle131.5 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle30.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.7
Nose tip rotation20.6 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.8 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle38.0 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

8.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.7 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)1.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)4.5 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.9 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle132.9 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

7.8
Recession relative to Frankfort-1.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

8.7
Gonial angle126.0 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

3.4
Mandibular plane angle17.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.70

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line22.7 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle122.8 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead slope

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.

Browridge inclination (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw length

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.

Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear set

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.55

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.42

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.25

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.24

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

Wide intercanthal spacing

-0.19

There is more than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads wide-set.

One eye apart test (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Paul Rudd's strongest and weakest features

Paul Rudd scores 6.89 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.96 side against 6.24 front. His cheekbones, his lip and chin proportions and his nose and lips in profile are his strongest features, and his costs come from a long, narrow face, a narrow angle from his nose base to his eye corners, thin lips, round, wide-set eyes and a soft jaw-to-neck line.

From the front, his middle and lower thirds are in band, his temples are the right width, and his cheekbones sit high. His pupils sit the right distance apart for his face width, his nose is the right width for the space between his eyes, and his nose tip sits level with his nostrils. His upper lip is the right length, his cupid's bow is well defined, his chin is in proportion to his philtrum, his mouth is the right width for his pupils, and his mouth corners sit well. His jaw angle matches the angle from his nose base to his outer eye corners, and his jaw is the right width. In profile, his brow ridge, total facial convexity, convexity through the nose bridge and anterior facial depth are in band, and his midface carries his nose base forward correctly. His nose's forward length is in proportion to its height, and his nasolabial, tip and nasomental angles, tip rotation, bridge line and the incline of the underside of his nose are ideal. Both lips sit on the Burstone reference, the S-line and the E-line. His jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are ideal.

His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.63 against 1.96 to 2, which takes about 0.55 of a point, and his full face reads long for its width, at 1.52 against 1.34 to 1.37, which is his weakest single metric at 0.55 out of 10. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is narrow, at 81.1 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5, and his lips are thin, at 0.25 against 0.297 to 0.363. His eyes are set wide for their length, at 1.27 eye widths apart against 1.05 to 1.1, and his eye openings read round, at an aspect ratio of 2.66 against 3 to 3.5. In profile, his jaw meets his neck at a wide 122.8 degrees where 94 to 106 is ideal, his face angles back from the brow, at a convexity through the brow of 164.2 degrees against 170 to 175, and the step from his brow to his nose is shallow, at a nasofrontal angle of 138.0 degrees against 116 to 128.