Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Paul Newman - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor - Cool Hand Luke, The Hustler, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Paul Newman is built on the jaw and the nose, with a sharp jaw corner, a long clean line from the corner to the mouth, a deep well-set face and lips sitting right on the profile line. It thins out lower down, with a short lower third, a small chin against the upper lip, a flat midface and a soft line under the jaw.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- Jewish-Slovak American
- Eyes:
- Blue
- Harmony:
- 6.0 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Paul Newman's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
6.0
out of 10
Top 28%
Front view
5.6
out of 10
Top 39%
Side view
6.7
out of 10
Top 10%
Best looking out of 4 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
10.0 / 10
Face shape
5.9 / 10
Eyes and brows
4.4 / 10
Nose
6.7 / 10
Mouth and lips
7.0 / 10
Ears
4.1 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
8.0 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
6.8 / 10
Profile convexity
5.3 / 10
Nose
7.0 / 10
Lips
9.4 / 10
Chin and jaw
8.9 / 10
Neck
0.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal eye spacing
10.0This contributes to a balanced midface due to the eyes sitting neither too close together nor too far apart.
Eye separation ratio (front view)
Ideal upper third
10.0This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.
Top third (front view)
Ideal chin crease
10.0This contributes to a defined chin due to the lip-chin transition being defined but soft.
Mentolabial angle (side view)
Ideal neck width
10.0This contributes to a proportionate frame due to the neck sizing well against the jaw.
Neck width (front view)
Ideal lip fullness
10.0This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.
Lip fullness (front view)
Ideal profile convexity
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.
Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
High-set mouth
-0.40The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.
Lower third proportion (front view)
Narrow midface
-0.39The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Long chin or short philtrum
-0.36The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.
Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)
Long, narrow face shape
-0.34The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.
Total facial width to height ratio (front view)
Protruding ears
-0.28The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion angle (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Paul Newman's strongest and weakest features
Paul Newman scores 6.04 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 6.73 side against 5.62 front. His jaw, lips and facial thirds are his strongest features, and his costs come from a short upper lip, a long chin, a long midface and face, his ears and flat brows.
From the front, his upper, middle and lower thirds are in band and his cheekbones sit high. His pupils sit the right distance apart for his face width. His nose tip sits level with his nostrils, his lips are full, and his upper and lower lips are in proportion. His jaw slope, jaw width and jaw angle toward the chin are ideal, and his neck is the right width. In profile, his forehead leans back from the brow correctly, his facial convexity through the brow is in band, and his face is deep for its height as the ideal asks. His nose projection, tip rotation and the incline of the underside of his nose are ideal. His lips sit on the E-line for both lips, and his mentolabial angle, jaw corner angle, jaw plane and jaw corner height are ideal.
His largest cost is that his upper lip is short, taking up 27.7% of the lower third against 31 to 33.5%, which is his weakest single metric at 1.35 out of 10. His midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.79 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.39 of a point. His chin is long, at 3.05 times his philtrum against 2.15 to 2.45, and his full face is long for its width, at 1.43 against 1.34 to 1.37. His ears stand out from his head at 15.1 degrees against 10 to 11.5, and his brows sit flat, tilting at 0.53 degrees against 6.5 to 11.