Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Olivia Rodrigo - Facial Harmony Analysis

Singer-songwriter and actor - Drivers License, Vampire, Sour, Guts

Olivia Rodrigo has a compact front view, with high cheekbones, low-set tilted brows, balanced lips and a clean jaw taper. The profile gives it back, with hollow under-eyes, narrow eyes set wide for their size, a steep jaw plane, a high jaw corner and a flat upper forehead.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Filipino-American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.4 / 10
Olivia Rodrigo front portrait
Olivia Rodrigo side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Olivia Rodrigo's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.4

out of 10

Top 0.03%

Side view

5.9

out of 10

Top 32%

Best looking out of 60 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.4/ 10 harmony
Olivia Rodrigo front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.1 / 10

Top third34.76%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

7.3
Middle third32.06%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.9
Lower third33.18%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

8.0 / 10

Face width to height1.93

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

9.9
Bitemporal width92.53%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.02

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
10.0
Cheekbone height90.30%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.5 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.3 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.65

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.23

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio44.95%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

5.3
One eye apart test1.25

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

1.6
Eyebrow tilt16.7 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

8.3
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

9.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.6
Deviation of IAA and JFA4.9 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

7.3
Nose bridge to nose width2.16

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.06

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.9
Nose tip position1.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.59

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

7.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.65

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.33

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

8.4
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

1.8
Mouth to nose width1.51

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

9.9
Mouth corner position4.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

8.5

Ears

7.4 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.57%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

4.7

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.7 / 10

Jaw slope143.1 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

10.0
Bigonial width88.75%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.9
Lower third proportion30.72%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

8.6
Jaw frontal angle90.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width77.70%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.9/ 10 harmony
Olivia Rodrigo side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

7.1 / 10

Browridge inclination16.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle146.0 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

10.0
Upper forehead slope3.7 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

1.4

Profile convexity

6.9 / 10

Z angle74.8 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

8.9
Total facial convexity143.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-3.6 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)168.8 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth67.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)166.2 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

6.7
Facial depth to height1.34

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection67.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

6.1 / 10

Nasal width to height0.52

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

0.0
Nasal projection0.52

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

9.1
Nasolabial angle93.6 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

8.2
Nasal tip angle134.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle134.9 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

2.5
Nasofacial angle27.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.0
Nose tip rotation22.2 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection0.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle35.7 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

5.4

Lips

8.8 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.7 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.2
Upper lip (S-line)-1.1 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.8 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

9.2
Upper lip (E-line)1.8 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-0.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

8.5
Holdaway H line-1.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

4.4

Chin and jaw

3.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle145.9 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-0.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

8.7
Gonial angle129.6 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

2.6
Mandibular plane angle29.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.56

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.1
Gonion to mouth line3.1 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

0.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle104.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Upper lip (E-line) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal facial convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.

Total facial convexity (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw corner

10.0

This contributes to a defined lower face due to the jaw turning at a classical angle.

Jaw slope (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofrontal angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the forehead flowing into the nose at a classical angle.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeSide view

Long, shallow nose

-0.26

The nose is tall for how far it projects, which reads long and flat in profile.

Nasal width to height (side view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.22

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

High-set jaw corner

-0.22

The jaw corner sits high against the mouth line, which can shorten the visible jaw.

Gonion to mouth line (side view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.21

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeSide view

Steep mandibular plane

-0.18

The jawline drops steeply toward the chin, which can read as a long or weak lower face.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Olivia Rodrigo's strongest and weakest features

Olivia Rodrigo scores 7.42 overall, and her front clearly outscores her profile: 8.35 front against 5.89 side. Her front view is close to ideal, and most of her cost comes from the nose and jaw in profile.

From the front, her lower third is in band and her full face is ideally proportioned for its width. Her cheekbones sit high, her outer eye corners tilt correctly, and her brows are set low and the right length for the face. Her nose bridge is proportioned to her nostrils, and her lips are sized correctly to each other. Her jaw is clean head-on: her jaw slope, the angle where the two sides of her jaw meet, and her neck width are all ideal. In profile, her brow ridge, the step from brow to nose and her facial convexity are in band, her nose tip angle and rotation are ideal, her upper lip sits on all three lip references, and her submental angle is ideal.

Her largest cost is the shape of her nose in profile: its forward length is short for its height, at 0.52 against 0.67 to 0.83. Her jaw corner sits high, only 3.1mm below the line of her mouth where 13.7 to 29.8mm is ideal, and her jaw plane is steep, at 29.9 degrees against 15 to 22. In profile, the front of her cheek sits behind the front of her eye, at an orbital vector of -3.6 against 1 to 10. From the front, her temples are wide, at 92.5% of her cheekbone width against 80.1 to 85.7%, and her eye openings read round, at an aspect ratio of 2.23 against 2.77 to 3.36.