Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Nicolas Cage - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Leaving Las Vegas, Face/Off, Pig

Nicolas Cage's nose is the anchor, well-proportioned from bridge to tip with a good tip angle and the upper lip sitting right beneath it. Everything around it reads soft: a flat midface, hollow under-eyes with no cheek support, a mouth narrow against the nose, no jaw-to-neck line and a face that runs wide and short.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Italian-German American
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
4.0 / 10
Nicolas Cage front portrait
Nicolas Cage side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Nicolas Cage's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

3.9

out of 10

Bottom 25%

Side view

4.2

out of 10

Bottom 36%

Worst looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

3.9/ 10 harmony
Nicolas Cage front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

8.5 / 10

Top third34.06%

Ideal 30 to 32

5.5
Middle third31.15%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.9
Lower third34.78%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

4.0 / 10

Face width to height1.69

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width89.98%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.83

Ideal 0.97 to 1

0.0
0.0
Cheekbone height88.39%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.5 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt2.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.90

Ideal 0 to 0.45

5.1
Eye aspect ratio3.18

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio42.43%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.0
One eye apart test1.11

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt-0.1 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

6.6

Nose

4.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle77.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA2.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

10.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.50

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.38

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

0.0
Nose tip position2.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.4
Chin to philtrum ratio2.13

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.79

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.37

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.78

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

8.4
Mouth to nose width1.13

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

0.0
Mouth corner position0.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.19%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle15.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.9 / 10

Jaw slope147.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.8
Bigonial width87.42%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion32.86%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle79.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.6
Neck width88.46%

Ideal 92 to 98

8.2

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.2/ 10 harmony
Nicolas Cage side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

3.1 / 10

Browridge inclination24.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.2
Nasofrontal angle143.6 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope9.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

5.3 / 10

Z angle75.2 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

5.7
Total facial convexity141.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-6.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)167.7 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

7.0
Anterior facial depth78.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

0.0
Facial convexity (nasion)166.0 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.9
Facial depth to height1.29

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.6
Interior midface projection75.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

9.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.73

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

6.0
Nasolabial angle106.2 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.7 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle30.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation20.1 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection0.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle33.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

5.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-5.0 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

3.5
Upper lip (S-line)2.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

2.0
Lower lip (S-line)-2.1 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.4
Upper lip (E-line)6.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.8
Lower lip (E-line)0.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.1
Holdaway H line-3.7 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

4.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle121.6 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-9.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle125.4 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

4.7
Mandibular plane angle29.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.64

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line9.6 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

3.7

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle131.2 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin crease

10.0

This contributes to a defined chin due to the lip-chin transition being defined but soft.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.57

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.46

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.39

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.38

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.37

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.