Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Nessa Barrett - Facial Harmony Analysis

Singer and creator - TikTok, Young Forever, Die First

Nessa Barrett has the frame and the cheekbones, with a strong brow ridge, a forward midface, a sharp jaw corner and a narrow, well-shaped nose. The profile is the weaker half, with lips held back behind the line, a nose that drops at the base and steeply angled brows.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Puerto Rican-American
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
5.9 / 10
Nessa Barrett front portrait
Nessa Barrett side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Nessa Barrett's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.7

out of 10

Top 11%

Side view

4.6

out of 10

Bottom 44%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.7/ 10 harmony
Nessa Barrett front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

2.7 / 10

Top third28.63%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

3.4
Middle third36.50%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

3.0
Lower third34.86%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

1.5

Face shape

7.0 / 10

Face width to height1.75

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width84.27%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

10.0
Midface ratio0.97

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

5.1
9.8
Cheekbone height88.63%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt7.0 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.85

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.16

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio46.30%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.9
One eye apart test1.28

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt2.9 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

0.0
Brow length to face width0.57

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

4.2

Nose

6.6 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle83.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

3.1
Deviation of IAA and JFA10.7 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.14

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width0.99

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position1.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

9.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.3 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.39

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.38

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.3
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.85

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

5.2
Mouth to nose width1.58

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position0.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

8.3 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.92%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

6.6

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.1 / 10

Jaw slope139.7 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

8.4
Bigonial width87.15%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion33.34%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle94.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.8
Neck width83.99%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

7.1

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.6/ 10 harmony
Nessa Barrett side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.0 / 10

Browridge inclination17.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle125.9 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope5.3 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

7.9

Profile convexity

5.7 / 10

Z angle74.8 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

8.9
Total facial convexity152.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

1.8
Orbital vector-1.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

5.0
Facial convexity (glabella)173.1 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth65.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)168.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.54

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection57.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

5.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle83.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle138.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle134.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

3.8
Nasofacial angle32.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation37.4 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.8
Frankfort tip angle50.5 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

5.1

Lips

1.4 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-8.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

0.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-7.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.0
Upper lip (S-line)-4.5 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)-5.9 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)-1.4 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.7
Lower lip (E-line)-4.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

0.0
Holdaway H line-3.6 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

8.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle137.6 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.0
Recession relative to Frankfort2.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle120.9 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle21.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.49

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

4.7
Gonion to mouth line10.4 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

6.7

Neck

6.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle111.9 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose base carrying classically forward of the ear.

Anterior facial depth (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw angle

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking definition or being overly sharp at its corner.

Gonial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofacial angle

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose lifting off the facial plane at a classical angle.

Nasofacial angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.36

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Flat eyebrow tilt

-0.33

The brows rise little toward their peaks, which can read heavy or tired.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.27

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.25

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Deep-set nasal root

-0.23

The transition from forehead to nose is sharp, which can read as a heavy brow or deep root.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.