Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Natalie Portman - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Black Swan, Leon: The Professional, Thor

Natalie Portman's proportions sit right, with an even midface and lower face, high cheekbones and low-set tilted brows over eyes spaced exactly one apart. The face is soft where the structure wants sharp, with a rounder eye shape, a broad jaw, a nose that projects hard and a loose jaw-to-neck line.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Israeli-American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.5 / 10
Natalie Portman front portrait
Natalie Portman side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Natalie Portman's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.8

out of 10

Top 0.4%

Side view

6.9

out of 10

Top 6.5%

Best looking out of 70 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.8/ 10 harmony
Natalie Portman front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

7.8 / 10

Top third35.43%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

3.3
Middle third33.18%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third31.39%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

4.6 / 10

Face width to height1.78

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width89.59%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

2.9
Midface ratio1.03

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
0.0
Cheekbone height89.22%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.7 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.70

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.31

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio48.93%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

4.9
One eye apart test1.14

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.4
Eyebrow tilt12.1 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.68

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

7.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.2
Deviation of IAA and JFA8.5 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.19

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.00

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position2.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.24

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.82

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.32

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

7.8
Interpupillary to mouth width0.84

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

6.6
Mouth to nose width1.63

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

8.3
Mouth corner position3.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.84%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle10.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.7 / 10

Jaw slope137.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

3.7
Bigonial width90.55%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

6.0
Lower third proportion32.24%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle93.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Neck width83.12%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

8.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.9/ 10 harmony
Natalie Portman side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.9 / 10

Browridge inclination15.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle138.8 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

9.9
Upper forehead slope6.4 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

9.9

Profile convexity

7.3 / 10

Z angle80.3 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.9
Total facial convexity144.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.9 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

2.3
Facial convexity (glabella)174.9 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

9.5
Anterior facial depth70.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

8.5
Facial convexity (nasion)172.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.44

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection62.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

8.2

Nose

8.3 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.77

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle104.6 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle142.6 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

4.6
Nasomental angle131.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle31.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation27.4 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.9 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle39.6 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.9

Lips

7.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.9 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.7
Upper lip (S-line)2.5 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.2 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

0.6
Upper lip (E-line)5.7 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

8.4
Lower lip (E-line)4.0 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.7 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

6.1 / 10

Mentolabial angle134.3 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort-3.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

2.2
Gonial angle108.6 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

0.0
Mandibular plane angle22.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.51

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

6.5
Gonion to mouth line10.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

7.7

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle123.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower-third balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth sitting a classical third of the way from nose to chin.

Lower third proportion (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose flare

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.28

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeSide view

Concave profile

-0.22

The profile runs flat to concave at the nose base, which can read as a prominent chin or flat midface.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

severeSide view

Soft chin-neck definition

-0.21

The angle under the chin is open, which reads as a soft or receding under-chin area.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

severeSide view

Compressed jaw angle

-0.20

The jaw corner is tighter than the reference range, which can read harsh.

Gonial angle (side view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.19

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.