Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Monica Bellucci - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor and model - Malèna, Irréversible, The Matrix Reloaded

Monica Bellucci has upturned eyes, well-set brows, high cheekbones, full lips and a balanced profile with a well-shaped nose and a chin that sits well forward. Her eyes are round, her midface runs long, her nose is wide with a tip that hangs low, her cupid's bow is shallow and her jaw blends softly into the neck.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Italian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.9 / 10
Monica Bellucci front portrait
Monica Bellucci side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Monica Bellucci's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.2%

Side view

8.5

out of 10

Top 0.008%

Best looking out of 400 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
Monica Bellucci front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.9 / 10

Top third33.95%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

9.8
Middle third34.33%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third31.72%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

7.3 / 10

Face width to height1.82

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width86.27%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

9.9
Midface ratio0.98

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

6.6
10.0
Cheekbone height95.88%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt8.3 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.68

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.26

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio46.13%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.8
One eye apart test1.16

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.8
Eyebrow tilt14.3 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.61

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.0

Nose

2.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle81.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA12.9 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width1.93

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

0.6
Intercanthal to nasal width1.12

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

7.8
Nose tip position3.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

3.6

Mouth and lips

6.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

2.7
Chin to philtrum ratio2.32

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.74

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.34

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.82

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

8.4
Mouth to nose width1.42

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.4
Mouth corner position5.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

4.2

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.89%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle10.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.8 / 10

Jaw slope140.4 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.2
Bigonial width86.09%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion32.05%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle94.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.6
Neck width76.88%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.5/ 10 harmony
Monica Bellucci side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

8.2 / 10

Browridge inclination23.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

6.1
Nasofrontal angle136.8 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

8.4
Upper forehead slope7.5 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

8.2 / 10

Z angle76.9 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

10.0
Total facial convexity141.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.9 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

6.6
Facial convexity (glabella)162.7 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

0.0
Anterior facial depth63.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.8
Facial convexity (nasion)161.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.39

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection51.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.2

Nose

8.6 / 10

Nasal width to height0.60

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

0.0
Nasal projection0.59

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

10.0
Nasolabial angle101.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle131.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.7 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.8
Nasofacial angle29.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

7.9
Nose tip rotation30.4 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.9
Mid nose projection-0.5 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle41.9 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.0 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)-0.7 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)0.1 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)2.1 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)1.8 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle147.5 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort3.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle127.4 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

7.9
Mandibular plane angle20.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.64

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line14.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

5.5 / 10

Submental cervical angle112.2 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

5.5

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal neck width

10.0

This contributes to a proportionate frame due to the neck sizing well against the jaw.

Neck width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw width

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.

Bigonial width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.

Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lip-chin plane

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower profile due to the lips and chin falling in one plane on Holdaway's H-line.

Holdaway H line (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal chin-philtrum balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to chin height and philtrum length sitting in classical proportion.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.28

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.22

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.22

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.21

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.17

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Monica Bellucci's strongest and weakest features

Monica Bellucci scores 7.91 overall, and her profile outscores her front: 8.54 side against 7.52 front. Her profile, eye tilt, brows and lips are her strongest features, and her costs come from the front: the jaw angle, round eye openings, a long midface, a wide nose and a shallow cupid's bow.

From the front, her middle and lower thirds are in band, her temples are the right width, her full face is the right length for its width, and her cheekbones sit high. Her eyes tilt upward at the ideal angle, and her brows sit at the right height and tilt correctly. Her lips are full and in proportion, her upper lip is the ideal length, and her chin is in proportion to her philtrum. Her ears sit flat, and her jaw and neck are the right width. In profile, her upper forehead slope and Z angle are in band, her total facial convexity and convexity through the nose bridge are in band, and her face is deep for its height as the ideal asks. Her nose projection, nasolabial angle, tip angle, tip rotation and bridge line are ideal. Both lips sit on all three lip references, and her lips meet the Holdaway line. Her chin sits correctly forward, and her jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are ideal.

Her largest cost is that her jaw angle differs from the angle from nose base to outer eye corners by 12.9 degrees, where 1.73 or less is ideal, which is her weakest single metric at 3.29 out of 10 and takes about 0.28 of a point. Her eye openings read round, at an aspect ratio of 2.26 against 2.77 to 3.36, and her midface reads long for the width of her cheekbones, at 1.82 against 1.94 to 1.98. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is narrow, at 81.5 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5. Her nose is wide: her mouth is 1.42 times her nose width against 1.52 to 1.6, and her nose bridge is wide for her nostrils, at 1.93 against 2.14 to 2.22. Her cupid's bow is shallow, at 1.5mm against 2.3 to 4mm, and her nose tip hangs 3.9mm below her nostrils, where 0 to 3mm is ideal. In profile, her nose's forward length is short for its height, at 0.60 against 0.67 to 0.83, her profile is more convex than ideal through the brow, at 162.7 degrees against 167.6 to 174.1, and her chin crease is shallow, at a mentolabial angle of 147.5 degrees against 118.1 to 134.2.