Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Miles Teller - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor - Whiplash, Top Gun: Maverick, The Offer
Miles Teller's mouth and lower face are the strong part, with full lips sitting right on the profile line, an evenly cut lower third and a flat forehead above a straight side profile. Above the nose it works against him, with a short forehead, short flat brows set high over narrow eye openings, no cheek support under the eye, a wide nose against a narrow mouth and a jaw that slopes off without a corner.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- Russian Jewish, Irish and English
- Eyes:
- Hazel
- Harmony:
- 4.2 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Miles Teller's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
4.2
out of 10
Bottom 34%
Front view
2.4
out of 10
Bottom 0.8%
Side view
7.1
out of 10
Top 4.8%
Worst looking out of 3 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
4.2 / 10
Face shape
7.7 / 10
Eyes and brows
2.5 / 10
Nose
5.2 / 10
Mouth and lips
4.5 / 10
Ears
0.9 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
6.0 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
7.4 / 10
Profile convexity
7.2 / 10
Nose
9.8 / 10
Lips
8.7 / 10
Chin and jaw
5.2 / 10
Neck
0.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal eye shape
10.0This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.
Eye aspect ratio (front view)
Ideal tip position
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting classically on the levelled head.
Frankfort tip angle (side view)
Ideal neck width
10.0This contributes to a proportionate frame due to the neck sizing well against the jaw.
Neck width (front view)
Ideal facial convexity
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.
Total facial convexity (side view)
Ideal profile line
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to the chin and lips falling on a classical line.
Z angle (side view)
Ideal jaw width
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.
Bigonial width (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Protruding ears
-0.49The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion angle (front view)
Narrow midface
-0.48The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Midface-jaw mismatch
-0.47The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.
Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)
Square lower face
-0.36The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.
Jaw frontal angle (front view)
Flat eyebrow tilt
-0.36The brows rise little toward their peaks, which can read heavy or tired.
Eyebrow tilt (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Miles Teller's strongest and weakest features
Miles Teller scores 4.16 overall, and the gap between his photos is large: 7.07 side against 2.38 front. His profile holds up well, and almost all of his cost comes from the ears, the jaw shape and the brows seen head-on.
From the front, his temples are in band and his eyes have an ideal aspect ratio. His nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes, and his lips are full. His bigonial width, neck width and the split of his lower third between lip and chin are ideal. In profile, his forehead slope, Z angle and facial convexity are in band, his nose angles, tip rotation and bridge line are ideal, his chin sits at the right depth, and the rear of his jaw is the right length.
His largest cost is ear protrusion: his ears are angled out at 23.3 degrees where 10 to 11.5 is ideal, which is his weakest single metric at 0.59 out of 10. His midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.77 against 1.96 to 2. His jaw angle and the angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners differ by 24.7 degrees, against an ideal of 2.5 or less, and the two sides of his jaw meet below the chin at a wide 108.7 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5. His brows sit high above his eyes, at 1.64 against 0 to 0.45, and they tilt slightly downward, at -1.1 degrees where 6.5 to 11 is ideal.