Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Mila Kunis - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Black Swan, That '70s Show, Friends with Benefits

Mila Kunis is close to a clean sheet, with a compact frame, high cheekbones, long almond eyes well spaced over a small, well-angled nose and a full mouth on a defined chin. What little shows against it sits wide and low, with broad temples, a long bottom third, a lower lip heavier than the upper and a jaw corner that rounds off into the neck.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Ukrainian Jewish
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
8.4 / 10
Mila Kunis front portrait
Mila Kunis side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Mila Kunis's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.4

out of 10

Top 0.02%

Side view

8.5

out of 10

Top 0.009%

Best looking out of 6,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.4/ 10 harmony
Mila Kunis front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.4 / 10

Top third32.77%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third31.55%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.3
Lower third35.68%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

7.0 / 10

Face width to height1.98

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width95.93%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.12

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

6.4
8.7
Cheekbone height90.40%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.3 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

2.7
Eyebrow low setedness1.05

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.7
Eye aspect ratio3.14

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

10.0
Eye separation ratio46.72%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

10.0
One eye apart test1.06

Ideal 0.95 to 1

8.0
Eyebrow tilt16.7 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

8.5
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

9.5 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle93.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.8
Deviation of IAA and JFA4.4 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

8.2
Nose bridge to nose width2.24

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.03

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position-0.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

9.8

Mouth and lips

8.0 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.22

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.13

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.40

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.78

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.52

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position-0.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.18%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.8 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.0 / 10

Jaw slope141.0 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.7
Bigonial width83.66%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.9
Lower third proportion31.33%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle97.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

6.0
Neck width82.57%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

9.5

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.5/ 10 harmony
Mila Kunis side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.9 / 10

Browridge inclination23.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

4.2
Nasofrontal angle134.6 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

5.2
Upper forehead slope4.6 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

5.2

Profile convexity

8.0 / 10

Z angle76.6 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.9
Total facial convexity140.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.7 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

3.2
Facial convexity (glabella)167.0 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

9.8
Anterior facial depth69.6 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.3
Facial convexity (nasion)164.8 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

9.5
Facial depth to height1.50

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

1.8
Interior midface projection54.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.8 / 10

Nasal width to height0.77

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.80

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle104.3 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle135.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle126.0 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation32.0 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.0
Mid nose projection-1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle43.2 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

9.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.2 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-0.7 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)3.2 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)0.9 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line-0.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

7.9

Chin and jaw

10.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle129.0 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort2.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle120.7 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle15.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.62

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line18.9 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

2.2 / 10

Submental cervical angle114.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

2.2

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface compactness

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to cheekbone width and midface height sitting in classical proportion.

Face width to height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye spacing

10.0

This contributes to a balanced midface due to the eyes sitting neither too close together nor too far apart.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.29

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.21

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.20

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

severeSide view

Over-projected nose tip

-0.17

The tip projects far for the bridge length, which can dominate the profile.

Nasal projection (side view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.12

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.