Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Mila Kunis - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor - Black Swan, That '70s Show, Friends with Benefits
Mila Kunis is close to a clean sheet, with a compact frame, high cheekbones, long almond eyes well spaced over a small, well-angled nose and a full mouth on a defined chin. What little shows against it sits wide and low, with broad temples, a long bottom third, a lower lip heavier than the upper and a jaw corner that rounds off into the neck.
- Gender:
- Female
- Ethnicity:
- Ukrainian Jewish
- Eyes:
- Hazel
- Harmony:
- 8.5 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Mila Kunis's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
8.5
out of 10
Top 0.01%
Front view
8.4
out of 10
Top 0.02%
Side view
8.5
out of 10
Top 0.009%
Best looking out of 8,000 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
6.4 / 10
Face shape
7.0 / 10
Eyes and brows
8.7 / 10
Nose
9.5 / 10
Mouth and lips
8.0 / 10
Ears
10.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
9.0 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
4.9 / 10
Profile convexity
8.0 / 10
Nose
8.8 / 10
Lips
9.7 / 10
Chin and jaw
10.0 / 10
Neck
2.2 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal ear set
10.0This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.
Ear protrusion ratio (front view)
Ideal tip position
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting classically on the levelled head.
Frankfort tip angle (side view)
Ideal cheekbone height
10.0This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.
Cheekbone height (front view)
Ideal nasolabial angle
10.0This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.
Nasolabial angle (side view)
Ideal jaw angle
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking definition or being overly sharp at its corner.
Gonial angle (side view)
Ideal upper lip position (Burstone)
10.0This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.
Upper lip (Burstone) (side view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Wide forehead
-0.28The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.
Bitemporal width (front view)
Long lower face
-0.21The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.
Lower third (front view)
Heavy lower lip
-0.19The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.
Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)
Over-projected nose tip
-0.17The tip projects far for the bridge length, which can dominate the profile.
Nasal projection (side view)
Negative canthal tilt
-0.12The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.
Lateral canthal tilt (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Mila Kunis's strongest and weakest features
Mila Kunis scores 8.46 overall, with a balanced front and side (8.42 and 8.53), and 32 of her metrics inside their ideal ranges. Her eyes, mouth and profile are her strongest features, and her costs are small apart from her temples.
From the front, her upper third is in band, her face width to height ratio is ideal, and her cheekbones sit high. Her eyes have an ideal aspect ratio and are spaced correctly, and her brows are the right length for the face. Her nose is sized correctly to the space between her eyes. Her lips are full, her mouth is the right width for her nose, and her chin is proportioned to her philtrum. Her ears sit flat. In profile, her facial convexity is in band, her nose angles and bridge line are ideal, her lips sit on the Burstone and S-line references, her chin sits at the right depth, and her mentolabial angle, jaw corner angle, jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are all ideal.
Her largest cost is temple width: her temples measure 95.9% of her cheekbone width, where 80.1 to 85.7% is ideal for women. Her lower third takes up 35.7% of the face against 29.5 to 33.2%, and her lower lip is full relative to her upper lip, at 2.13 against 1.55 to 1.85. In profile, her nose projects further than ideal, at 0.80 against 0.55 to 0.62, and her face is slightly deep for its height, at 1.50 against 1.3 to 1.44. Her outer eye corners tilt up 4.3 degrees where 7.07 to 8.36 is ideal for women.