Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Matthew Noszka - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and actor - Nike, Calvin Klein, No Hard Feelings

Matthew Noszka carries the whole read in the upper face, with broad temples, high cheekbones and wide-set eyes sitting on real bone support. It thins out below the nose, with a short forehead over a long lower third, a tip that turns up and a lower lip and chin that fall away behind the profile line.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Polish-Irish-German American
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
7.0 / 10
Matthew Noszka front portrait
Matthew Noszka side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Matthew Noszka's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.9

out of 10

Top 6.9%

Side view

7.0

out of 10

Top 5.6%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.9/ 10 harmony
Matthew Noszka front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third27.37%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.0
Middle third32.36%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third40.27%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

0.0

Face shape

8.0 / 10

Face width to height1.78

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width87.71%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.99

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
10.0
Cheekbone height88.82%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

5.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.4 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

6.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.97

Ideal 0 to 0.45

3.5
Eye aspect ratio2.71

Ideal 3 to 3.5

2.8
Eye separation ratio45.74%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

10.0
One eye apart test1.16

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.7
Eyebrow tilt2.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

1.6
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.3

Nose

6.5 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle89.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA7.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

3.5
Nose bridge to nose width2.19

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.2
Intercanthal to nasal width1.14

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position-1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

0.0

Mouth and lips

7.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.2 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.04

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

8.2
Lower to upper lip ratio1.64

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.45

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.3
Mouth to nose width1.38

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

8.9
Mouth corner position-0.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

6.5

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.29%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.6 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.5 / 10

Jaw slope142.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width92.05%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion34.39%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

2.8
Jaw frontal angle81.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.9
Neck width95.17%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.0/ 10 harmony
Matthew Noszka side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.1 / 10

Browridge inclination20.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle132.1 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

7.3
Upper forehead slope1.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

8.4 / 10

Z angle67.5 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity146.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector2.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)171.5 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth65.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)167.7 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.5
Facial depth to height1.50

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.0
Interior midface projection55.4 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.78

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.80

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle107.0 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle125.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

7.6
Nasomental angle132.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.8
Nasofacial angle31.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation29.2 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle36.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

4.4 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-7.4 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-4.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)4.6 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-2.0 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

0.7
Holdaway H line-4.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

8.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle130.8 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

9.2
Recession relative to Frankfort-2.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

7.7
Gonial angle122.7 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.3
Mandibular plane angle20.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.55

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

4.7
Gonion to mouth line13.5 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

9.6

Neck

1.4 / 10

Submental cervical angle116.2 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

1.4

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal neck width

10.0

This contributes to a proportionate frame due to the neck sizing well against the jaw.

Neck width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (S-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting on Steiner's S-line.

Upper lip (S-line) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.38

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeSide view

Retruded chin or protrusive lips

-0.24

The chin sits behind the lips' line, which reads as a weak chin or forward lips.

Z angle (side view)

severeFront view

Short forehead

-0.22

The forehead takes up less of the face than ideal, which can make the lower features read heavy.

Top third (front view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.22

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeFront view

Overfull lips

-0.21

The lips are deep for the width of the mouth, which can read as overfilled.

Lip fullness (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Matthew Noszka's strongest and weakest features

Matthew Noszka scores 6.95 overall, 6.92 front and 7.01 side. His midface, eyes, jaw slope and profile are his strongest features, and his costs come from a long midface, lips ahead of the chin, a short upper third and a long lower third.

From the front, his middle third, temples and midface ratio are in band, his full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and his cheekbones sit high. His pupils sit the right distance apart for his face width. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is ideal and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His upper and lower lips are in proportion, his ears sit flat, his jaw slope is ideal and his neck is the right width. In profile, his forehead leans back from the brow correctly, his upper forehead is in band, and his facial convexity is in band at the nose tip and through the brow. His cheek sits correctly forward of his eye, the angle at his ear notch between his nostril crease and lower eyelid is ideal, and his midface carries his nose base forward correctly. His nose length, nasolabial and nasofacial angles and the incline of the underside of his nose are ideal, his upper lip sits on the Burstone, S-line and E-line references, and his jaw plane is ideal.

His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.78 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.38 of a point. In profile, his lips sit ahead of his chin, at a Z angle of 67.5 degrees against 78 to 82. His upper third is short, at 27.4% of face height against 30 to 32%, and his lower third is long, at 40.3% against 33.9 to 37%. His lips are fuller than ideal, at 0.45 against 0.297 to 0.363, and the bottom of his nose sits above the line between his nostrils, at -1.0 against 0 to 3.