Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Matthew Gray Gubler - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Criminal Minds, 500 Days of Summer, Alvin and the Chipmunks

Matthew Gray Gubler is one of the cleaner profiles in the set, with lips right on the line, an even chin crease, a jaw that cuts hard into the neck and a well-proportioned nose and mouth head-on. What costs him is width and the eye area: a face far too narrow for its height, a short midface, flat eyes with no tilt, and a nose tip rotated well up.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.9 / 10
Matthew Gray Gubler front portrait
Matthew Gray Gubler side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Matthew Gray Gubler's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.2%

Side view

8.4

out of 10

Top 0.02%

Best looking out of 300 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
Matthew Gray Gubler front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

4.7 / 10

Top third33.68%

Ideal 30 to 32

7.0
Middle third27.93%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

0.0
Lower third38.39%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

7.1

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.86

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width88.05%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.99

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
0.0
Cheekbone height85.45%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt0.9 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.74

Ideal 0 to 0.45

8.1
Eye aspect ratio2.90

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.3
Eye separation ratio45.24%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.8
One eye apart test1.06

Ideal 0.95 to 1

8.4
Eyebrow tilt7.5 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.69

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

10.0

Nose

9.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle90.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA5.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

7.7
Nose bridge to nose width2.21

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

8.5
Intercanthal to nasal width1.13

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.2
Chin to philtrum ratio2.44

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.67

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.38

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

8.8
Interpupillary to mouth width0.90

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.0
Mouth to nose width1.49

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position-0.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.45%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.3 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.2 / 10

Jaw slope137.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

8.1
Bigonial width88.94%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion31.34%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle96.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.4
Neck width89.76%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.4

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.4/ 10 harmony
Matthew Gray Gubler side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

8.5 / 10

Browridge inclination22.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle133.3 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

5.4
Upper forehead slope0.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

8.0 / 10

Z angle87.2 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

1.9
Total facial convexity144.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector0.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.7
Facial convexity (glabella)169.8 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.9
Anterior facial depth64.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)166.9 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.6
Facial depth to height1.61

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

2.7
Interior midface projection54.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.75

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.73

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

6.4
Nasolabial angle109.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.9 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.3 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation36.3 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-0.7 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle49.1 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.9 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.2 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)4.6 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)3.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.6 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

9.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle133.6 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

7.2
Recession relative to Frankfort12.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle119.2 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle11.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.68

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line28.4 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle99.8 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.38

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.29

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Short midface

-0.22

The midface is compressed relative to the other thirds, which can crowd the eyes and nose together.

Middle third (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.22

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.20

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.