Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Matt Smith - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor - Doctor Who, House of the Dragon, The Crown
Matt Smith has the frame, with even thirds, low-set brows at a good tilt, high cheekbones over wide temples, a straight bridge and a chin that carries forward. The detail work fights it, with ears that swing wide, thin lips pushed forward of the profile line, a narrow high-set mouth and small eyes set wide for their size on a long, narrow midface.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- English
- Eyes:
- Green
- Harmony:
- 5.5 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Matt Smith's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
5.5
out of 10
Top 43%
Front view
4.1
out of 10
Bottom 32%
Side view
7.7
out of 10
Top 0.5%
Best looking out of 2 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
10.0 / 10
Face shape
6.0 / 10
Eyes and brows
5.7 / 10
Nose
3.3 / 10
Mouth and lips
5.4 / 10
Ears
0.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
7.9 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
6.6 / 10
Profile convexity
7.1 / 10
Nose
9.0 / 10
Lips
6.7 / 10
Chin and jaw
8.0 / 10
Neck
1.5 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal forehead width
10.0This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.
Bitemporal width (front view)
Straight nasal bridge
10.0This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.
Mid nose projection (side view)
Ideal nose flare
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the base widening in proportion to the bridge.
Nose bridge to nose width (front view)
Ideal lip-chin plane
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower profile due to the lips and chin falling in one plane on Holdaway's H-line.
Holdaway H line (side view)
Ideal chin position
10.0This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.
Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)
Ideal lower third
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.
Lower third (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Protruding ears
-0.45The ears stand out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion ratio (front view)
Narrow alar angle
-0.43The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.
Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)
Protruding ears
-0.41The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion angle (front view)
Thin lips
-0.41The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.
Lip fullness (front view)
Narrow midface
-0.37The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Matt Smith's strongest and weakest features
Matt Smith scores 5.49 overall, and his profile clearly outscores his front: 7.75 side against 4.11 front. His facial proportions and profile are his strongest features, and almost all of his cost comes from the ears, the lips and the nose base seen head-on.
From the front, all three facial thirds and his temples are in band, and his cheekbones sit high. His brows are set low and tilted correctly. His nose bridge is in proportion to his nostrils, his mouth is the right width for his pupil distance, and his bigonial width and neck width are ideal. In profile, his brow ridge and orbital vector are in band, his nose length, tip angle, tip rotation and bridge line are ideal, his midface carries his nose base forward correctly, his lips sit on the Burstone and Holdaway references, his chin sits at the right depth, and his jaw corner height is ideal.
His largest cost is ear protrusion: his ears protrude at a ratio of 18.6 where 8 to 12 is ideal, which is his weakest single metric at 0.82 out of 10, and they are angled out at 18.1 degrees against 10 to 11.5. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is narrow, at 74.4 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5. His lips are thin, at 0.20 against 0.297 to 0.363, and his mouth is narrow for his nose, at 1.22 nose widths against 1.42 to 1.5. His midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.81 against 1.96 to 2.