Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Matt Bomer - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - White Collar, Magic Mike, Fellow Travelers

High cheekbones and hunter eyes sit over a jawline that keeps its width and its angle the whole way back, with a straight, well-proportioned nose landing exactly where it should. The lips read thin and sit flat against the profile, the chin is short under a long philtrum, and the ears carry away from the head.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
8.2 / 10
Matt Bomer front portrait
Matt Bomer side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Matt Bomer's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.2

out of 10

Top 0.05%

Side view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.09%

Best looking out of 2,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.2/ 10 harmony
Matt Bomer front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.6 / 10

Top third32.34%

Ideal 30 to 32

9.9
Middle third30.50%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

8.8
Lower third37.16%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.9

Face shape

7.2 / 10

Face width to height1.78

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width94.16%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.6
Midface ratio0.93

Ideal 0.97 to 1

8.7
7.9
Cheekbone height89.09%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

9.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.5 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.47

Ideal 0 to 0.45

9.9
Eye aspect ratio2.90

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.3
Eye separation ratio46.84%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.9
One eye apart test1.13

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.7
Eyebrow tilt6.5 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.9
Brow length to face width0.67

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.7

Nose

9.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.1
Deviation of IAA and JFA3.1 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

9.9
Nose bridge to nose width2.08

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.07

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position1.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

8.2
Chin to philtrum ratio1.87

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.57

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.30

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.82

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.52

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.8
Mouth corner position3.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

3.2 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.93%

Ideal 8 to 12

6.4
Ear protrusion angle16.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

10.0 / 10

Jaw slope141.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width91.91%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion33.33%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle88.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width90.82%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
Matt Bomer side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.6 / 10

Browridge inclination12.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

2.7
Nasofrontal angle130.0 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

9.4
Upper forehead slope4.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

7.7

Profile convexity

7.3 / 10

Z angle81.3 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity142.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

6.7
Facial convexity (glabella)171.1 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth68.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.8
Facial convexity (nasion)167.5 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.9
Facial depth to height1.66

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection63.7 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

3.5

Nose

8.3 / 10

Nasal width to height0.79

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.79

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle113.6 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle133.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle128.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle35.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation25.1 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

5.3
Mid nose projection-0.6 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle37.4 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

6.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.8
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.8
Upper lip (S-line)3.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)7.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

6.4
Lower lip (E-line)5.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.4
Holdaway H line0.6 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

9.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle132.1 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

8.4
Recession relative to Frankfort-1.8 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

8.0
Gonial angle122.1 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

9.8
Mandibular plane angle18.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.65

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line20.1 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle104.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lip-chin plane

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower profile due to the lips and chin falling in one plane on Holdaway's H-line.

Holdaway H line (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose-chin balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection and chin position complementing each other.

Nasomental angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw corner

10.0

This contributes to a defined lower face due to the jaw turning at a classical angle.

Jaw slope (front view)

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.33

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.27

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.25

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Long philtrum or short chin

-0.17

The philtrum is long for the chin below it, which can make the lower face read bottom-light.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.12

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.