Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Marlon Lundgren-Garcia - Facial Harmony Analysis

Streamer and model - Twitch, Paris Fashion Week, Nike

Marlon Lundgren-Garcia reads clean in profile, with a straight brow-to-nose line, a well-set nose and a jaw that runs long and deep from the corner. Head-on it softens, with ears that swing wide, high-set brows, a rounded jaw angle and an upturned tip over a flat midface.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Swedish-Nigerian-Spanish
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
7.0 / 10
Marlon Lundgren-Garcia front portrait
Marlon Lundgren-Garcia side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Marlon Lundgren-Garcia's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.1

out of 10

Top 4%

Side view

6.9

out of 10

Top 7.8%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.1/ 10 harmony
Marlon Lundgren-Garcia front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

5.5 / 10

Top third28.30%

Ideal 30 to 32

3.1
Middle third32.56%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third39.13%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

3.4

Face shape

6.1 / 10

Face width to height1.88

Ideal 1.96 to 2

1.9
Bitemporal width88.87%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio1.14

Ideal 0.97 to 1

0.6
8.3
Cheekbone height81.74%

Ideal 83 to 100

9.9

Eyes and brows

7.1 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

8.1
Eyebrow low setedness1.44

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio2.76

Ideal 3 to 3.5

4.8
Eye separation ratio46.69%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

10.0
One eye apart test1.17

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

8.3
Eyebrow tilt7.9 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.6

Nose

7.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle94.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.6
Deviation of IAA and JFA9.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.09

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.07

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position0.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

9.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.7
Chin to philtrum ratio2.48

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.49

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.41

Ideal 0.297 to 0.443

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.81

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.8
Mouth to nose width1.47

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position-0.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.82%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle18.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.0 / 10

Jaw slope133.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width90.88%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion32.17%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle103.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width91.43%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.9/ 10 harmony
Marlon Lundgren-Garcia side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.6 / 10

Browridge inclination18.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle131.6 deg

Ideal 107.9 to 119.9

0.0
Upper forehead slope2.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

9.9

Profile convexity

5.7 / 10

Z angle72.5 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

0.0
Total facial convexity142.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-2.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.7
Facial convexity (glabella)171.4 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth72.0 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

5.5
Facial convexity (nasion)167.9 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.1
Facial depth to height1.36

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection69.2 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

8.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

6.0
Nasolabial angle98.0 deg

Ideal 84.4 to 101.4

10.0
Nasal tip angle129.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle126.3 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle36.2 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.3
Nose tip rotation27.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-1.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle38.6 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

8.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-6.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.2
Lower lip (Burstone)-4.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

6.6
Upper lip (S-line)-1.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

7.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

5.4
Upper lip (E-line)2.3 mm

Ideal -0.8 to 3.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)0.7 mm

Ideal -0.9 to 2.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-0.7 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

8.0

Chin and jaw

5.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle138.3 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

2.3
Recession relative to Frankfort-3.6 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

5.1
Gonial angle123.9 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

7.7
Mandibular plane angle27.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.73

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line13.8 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

9.8

Neck

8.6 / 10

Submental cervical angle110.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

8.6

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Lower lip (E-line) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower-third balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth sitting a classical third of the way from nose to chin.

Lower third proportion (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead slope

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.

Browridge inclination (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal depth-to-height balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced head shape due to facial depth sitting in classical proportion to face height.

Facial depth to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.35

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

High-set brows

-0.26

The brows sit high above the eyes, which can read surprised and soften eye-area definition.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

severeFront view

Square lower face

-0.23

The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

severeSide view

Recessed midface

-0.22

The midface falls away steeply under the eyes, which reads under-projected.

Interior midface projection (side view)

severeFront view

Overly sharp jaw corner

-0.21

The jaw turns more sharply than the reference range, which can read harsh.

Jaw slope (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Marlon Lundgren-Garcia's strongest and weakest features

Marlon Lundgren-Garcia scores 7.03 overall, with a 7.14 front and a 6.86 side. His strengths sit in the nose and the lower jaw, and his detractors are spread across the ears, brows and jaw.

His nose is one of his best features from both angles. The bridge width, tip position, nasolabial angle, nasal tip angle and mid nose projection are all in band, and the nose is correctly proportioned to the space between his eyes. His eyes are spaced well and his brows tilt. Toward the jaw, his bigonial width, the width across the jaw corners, is in band, and so is the ramus-to-mandible ratio, which gives the jaw its length from the corner. In profile, both lips sit on the E-line, and his facial convexity is ideal.

The largest single cost is ear protrusion: his ears angle out at 18.1 degrees against an ideal of 10 to 11.5, which costs about a third of a point. His brows sit high above the eyes, at 1.44 where 0 to 0.45 is ideal. The two sides of his jaw meet below the chin at a wide 104 degrees against 86.5 to 92.5, and his jaw corner turns more sharply than ideal, at 133.1 degrees against 140 to 142.5. His jaw angle and the angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners differ by 9.4 degrees. In profile, the midface reads flat, with an interior midface projection of 69.2 against an ideal of 53 to 60, and this is what holds the side score below the front.