Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Marko Jarić - Facial Harmony Analysis

Former professional basketball player - NBA guard, Yugoslavia national team

Marko Jaric's high cheekbones, broad jaw and forward chin give his face a strong frame, with full lips balancing the lower face. His close-set eyes and high, flat brows leave the eye area less defined, while a long midface and soft jaw-to-neck transition weaken the overall shape.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Serbian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
4.4 / 10
Marko Jarić front portrait
Marko Jarić side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Marko Jarić's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

2.9

out of 10

Bottom 4.2%

Side view

6.9

out of 10

Top 6.9%

Worst looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

2.9/ 10 harmony
Marko Jarić front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third26.34%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.0
Middle third36.45%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

0.0
Lower third37.20%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.9

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.65

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width85.99%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Midface ratio0.80

Ideal 0.97 to 1

0.0
9.9
Cheekbone height93.05%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

1.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt2.5 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness1.51

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio2.84

Ideal 3 to 3.5

7.9
Eye separation ratio38.92%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.0
One eye apart test0.81

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt-0.4 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.62

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

5.4

Nose

3.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle76.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA17.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.21

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

8.3
Intercanthal to nasal width1.50

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

0.0
Nose tip position1.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.3
Chin to philtrum ratio2.17

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.01

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.6
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.33

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

5.3
Mouth corner position0.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio12.17%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle14.7 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.7 / 10

Jaw slope138.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.7
Bigonial width88.62%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion31.95%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle93.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Neck width101.80%

Ideal 92 to 98

4.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.9/ 10 harmony
Marko Jarić side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

3.0 / 10

Browridge inclination30.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

3.1
Nasofrontal angle133.0 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

5.8
Upper forehead slope7.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

8.0 / 10

Z angle86.2 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

4.5
Total facial convexity145.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector2.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)174.9 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth68.1 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)170.5 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.3
Facial depth to height1.50

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.1
Interior midface projection54.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.90

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

6.6
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

5.4
Nasolabial angle64.4 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle131.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.9 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle30.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation11.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection0.6 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle28.5 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

5.1

Lips

8.4 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-6.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.5
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)1.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.3
Lower lip (S-line)1.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)8.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)4.7 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line0.5 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

6.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle132.2 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

8.3
Recession relative to Frankfort15.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.9
Gonial angle125.5 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

4.5
Mandibular plane angle11.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

8.7
Ramus to mandible ratio0.98

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

0.0
Gonion to mouth line47.1 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

9.1

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle119.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal chin-philtrum balance

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to chin height and philtrum length sitting in classical proportion.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal mouth corner position

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant resting expression due to the corners sitting level with or slightly above the mouth line.

Mouth corner position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw width

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.

Bigonial width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.62

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow intercanthal spacing

-0.42

There is less than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads close-set.

One eye apart test (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.42

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Close-set eyes

-0.41

The eyes sit close together for the width of the face, which can pinch the midface.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.41

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.