Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Mark Wahlberg (Marky Mark) - Facial Harmony Analysis
Actor and rapper - The Departed, Boogie Nights, Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch
Mark Wahlberg's lip line and jaw carry the profile, with a well-angled nose, lips sitting right on the line and a jaw that runs long and deep from the corner. Head-on it thins out, with a narrow mouth against a wide nose, ears that swing wide, a flat eye tilt and a soft jaw corner running into the neck.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- Irish-Swedish American
- Eyes:
- Hazel
- Harmony:
- 6.9 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Mark Wahlberg (Marky Mark)'s facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
6.9
out of 10
Top 7%
Front view
6.5
out of 10
Top 16%
Side view
7.6
out of 10
Top 0.8%
Best looking out of 10 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
4.9 / 10
Face shape
6.0 / 10
Eyes and brows
4.0 / 10
Nose
7.1 / 10
Mouth and lips
8.0 / 10
Ears
5.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
8.5 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
7.0 / 10
Profile convexity
9.9 / 10
Nose
7.3 / 10
Lips
7.0 / 10
Chin and jaw
6.6 / 10
Neck
0.0 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal forehead slope
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to the forehead leaning back at a classical angle.
Browridge inclination (side view)
Ideal nose tip height
10.0This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting just below the nostril line.
Nose tip position (front view)
Ideal profile convexity
10.0This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.
Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)
Ideal jaw width
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.
Bigonial width (front view)
Ideal depth-to-height balance
10.0This contributes to a balanced head shape due to facial depth sitting in classical proportion to face height.
Facial depth to height (side view)
Ideal jaw length
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking length or being overly long.
Ramus to mandible ratio (side view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Narrow mouth for the nose
-0.29The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.
Mouth to nose width (front view)
Protruding ears
-0.28The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.
Ear protrusion angle (front view)
Narrow midface
-0.22The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Short forehead
-0.19The forehead takes up less of the face than ideal, which can make the lower features read heavy.
Top third (front view)
Effaced chin crease
-0.19The crease between lip and chin is flat, which softens chin definition.
Mentolabial angle (side view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Mark Wahlberg (Marky Mark)'s strongest and weakest features
Mark Wahlberg (Marky Mark) scores 6.91 overall, and his profile outscores his front: 7.64 side against 6.46 front. His profile and jaw are his strongest features, and his costs are moderate, with no metric scoring below 3.40.
From the front, his middle third and temples are in band and his cheekbones sit high. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners matches his jaw angle, as the ideal asks. His chin is in proportion to his philtrum and his lips are full. His bigonial width and neck width are ideal. His profile is strong: his brow ridge, the step from his brow to his nose, his Z angle, facial convexity and facial depth are in band, his nose angle to the lip, bridge line and the incline of the underside of his nose are ideal, his lips sit on the Burstone, S-line and E-line references, and his jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are ideal.
His largest cost is a narrow mouth for his nose, at 1.19 nose widths where 1.42 to 1.5 is ideal, which takes about 0.29 of a point. His ears are angled out at 15.4 degrees against 10 to 11.5. His face is short for its width, at 1.28 against 1.34 to 1.37, and his forehead is short, at 27.8% of the face against 30 to 32%, while his midface reads slightly long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.86 against 1.96 to 2. In profile, the fold between his lower lip and chin is shallow, at 149.6 degrees against 111 to 127.