Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Luigi Mangione - Facial Harmony Analysis

Defendant - UnitedHealthcare CEO killing, federal stalking guilty plea

Luigi Mangione has the jaw and the mouth, with a wide jaw under a forward chin, a full midface and heavy lips beneath a well-set nose tip. It loses ground on a convex profile, an upturned tip, ears that swing wide and a lower face that runs long.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Italian-American
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.0 / 10
Luigi Mangione front portrait
Luigi Mangione side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Luigi Mangione's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.4

out of 10

Top 18%

Side view

5.3

out of 10

Top 46%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.4/ 10 harmony
Luigi Mangione front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

4.9 / 10

Top third27.90%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.3
Middle third33.16%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third38.94%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

4.4

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.86

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width92.13%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
0.0
Cheekbone height86.13%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.8 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

3.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.82

Ideal 0 to 0.45

6.6
Eye aspect ratio3.26

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio45.32%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.9
One eye apart test1.21

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

4.7
Eyebrow tilt6.6 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.68

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.9

Nose

6.2 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA10.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.30

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

1.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.18

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.9
Nose tip position0.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.2 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

5.2
Chin to philtrum ratio2.12

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.34

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.1
Lip fullness0.33

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.81

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.36

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

7.7
Mouth corner position-1.6 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

0.0

Ears

1.5 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio13.31%

Ideal 8 to 12

3.0
Ear protrusion angle17.5 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

6.7 / 10

Jaw slope137.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

8.1
Bigonial width89.34%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion34.70%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle98.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

5.6
Neck width96.76%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.3/ 10 harmony
Luigi Mangione side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.6 / 10

Browridge inclination23.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.8
Nasofrontal angle136.5 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

0.0
Upper forehead slope2.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

9.9

Profile convexity

6.7 / 10

Z angle82.4 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.9
Total facial convexity132.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector-1.4 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

5.1
Facial convexity (glabella)163.5 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

0.0
Anterior facial depth63.9 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)161.6 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.7
Facial depth to height1.36

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection57.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

4.0 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

5.6
Nasolabial angle122.4 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

0.0
Nasal tip angle136.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle121.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

0.0
Nasofacial angle38.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

3.8
Nose tip rotation36.2 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.0
Frankfort tip angle46.8 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

5.3 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

6.6
Lower lip (Burstone)0.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

4.6
Upper lip (S-line)3.1 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)6.0 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)6.0 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

7.1
Holdaway H line1.6 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.2

Chin and jaw

7.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle134.7 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

6.2
Recession relative to Frankfort5.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle127.3 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.3
Mandibular plane angle19.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.77

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line17.7 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

6.2 / 10

Submental cervical angle112.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

6.2

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal jaw width

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw being neither too narrow nor too wide for the cheekbones.

Bigonial width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal depth-to-height balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced head shape due to facial depth sitting in classical proportion to face height.

Facial depth to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal interior midface projection

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the midface carrying forward under the eyes at a classical angle.

Interior midface projection (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.36

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.27

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

severeFront view

Short, wide face shape

-0.25

The face is short for its width, which can read compact and heavy.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.25

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Low-set mouth

-0.20

The mouth sits low in the lower third, which shortens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.