Celebrity analysis

How attractive is KSI - Facial Harmony Analysis

Creator and boxer - YouTube, Sidemen, Prime

KSI's strengths sit in the bone, with a deep well-set face, a forward chin, flat ears and a long line from the jaw corner to the mouth. Around it the read is soft: a very wide face for its height, a sloping forehead, a jaw that melts into the neck and a mouth set well back behind the profile line.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
British Nigerian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
2.9 / 10
KSI front portrait
KSI side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

KSI's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

3.4

out of 10

Bottom 12%

Side view

2.2

out of 10

Bottom 0.4%

Worst looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

3.4/ 10 harmony
KSI front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third37.35%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.0
Middle third27.85%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

0.0
Lower third34.79%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

3.3 / 10

Face width to height1.82

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width100.27%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Midface ratio1.08

Ideal 0.97 to 1

6.6
0.0
Cheekbone height87.79%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.7 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

3.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.73

Ideal 0 to 0.45

8.1
Eye aspect ratio2.50

Ideal 3 to 3.5

0.0
Eye separation ratio50.00%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

0.0
One eye apart test1.07

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

10.0
Eyebrow tilt11.6 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.8
Brow length to face width0.59

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

2.2

Nose

5.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle92.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA23.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.38

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.24

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

6.8
Nose tip position1.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.9 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

10.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.09

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.5
Lower to upper lip ratio1.71

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.55

Ideal 0.297 to 0.443

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.2
Mouth to nose width1.31

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

2.9
Mouth corner position-0.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.31%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

4.6 / 10

Jaw slope157.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.0
Bigonial width85.08%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

8.1
Lower third proportion34.15%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

6.0
Jaw frontal angle68.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width99.78%

Ideal 92 to 98

8.8

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

2.2/ 10 harmony
KSI side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

0.7 / 10

Browridge inclination31.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

1.8
Nasofrontal angle128.1 deg

Ideal 107.9 to 119.9

0.2
Upper forehead slope15.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

0.0

Profile convexity

4.7 / 10

Z angle75.1 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

5.5
Total facial convexity158.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector-3.5 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)173.3 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth75.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

0.0
Facial convexity (nasion)168.0 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

8.0
Facial depth to height1.38

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection63.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

4.0

Nose

5.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.58

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

8.5
Nasal projection0.57

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

9.9
Nasolabial angle61.9 deg

Ideal 84.4 to 101.4

1.4
Nasal tip angle152.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

0.0
Nasomental angle139.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

1.9
Nasofacial angle29.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

8.2
Nose tip rotation25.7 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

3.8
Mid nose projection0.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle43.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

5.2

Lips

0.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-14.1 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

0.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-11.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

0.0
Upper lip (S-line)-9.7 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)-9.6 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)-6.0 mm

Ideal -0.8 to 3.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)-7.7 mm

Ideal -0.9 to 2.4

0.0
Holdaway H line-4.7 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

8.6 / 10

Mentolabial angle123.1 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort9.9 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle126.8 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

1.4
Mandibular plane angle19.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.70

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line25.0 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle135.9 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lip ratio

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lower lip being classically fuller than the upper.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal intercanthal spacing

10.0

This contributes to eye-area harmony due to close to one eye-width of space between the eyes.

One eye apart test (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal depth-to-height balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced head shape due to facial depth sitting in classical proportion to face height.

Facial depth to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear set

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.49

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.45

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Sloped jaw corner

-0.43

The jaw turns softly, which reduces the definition of the jaw corner.

Jaw slope (front view)

severeFront view

Overly tapered lower face

-0.41

The jawlines converge tightly, which can read as a pointed lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.36

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.