Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Kristina Pimenova - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and actor - Armani, Roberto Cavalli, Benetton, The Russian Bride

Kristina Pimenova's nose does the work: straight through the bridge, short, and gently upturned at the tip, over an upper lip that sits right on the profile line and a clean jaw corner. Above and below it the face gives way, with a tall forehead, round eyes with little support under them, a chin that sits back and reads long under the lip, and a jaw that softens into the neck.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Russian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
7.9 / 10
Kristina Pimenova front portrait
Kristina Pimenova side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Kristina Pimenova's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.3

out of 10

Top 0.04%

Side view

7.3

out of 10

Top 2.4%

Best looking out of 400 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.3/ 10 harmony
Kristina Pimenova front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.6 / 10

Top third37.20%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

0.0
Middle third31.90%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.9
Lower third30.91%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

9.7 / 10

Face width to height1.97

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

10.0
Bitemporal width87.49%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

8.5
Midface ratio1.07

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

9.9
9.9
Cheekbone height94.27%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.4 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt9.5 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

8.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.67

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.24

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio46.06%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

9.7
One eye apart test1.00

Ideal 0.95 to 1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt10.2 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

7.9 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle85.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.7
Deviation of IAA and JFA9.4 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.27

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.7
Intercanthal to nasal width1.07

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

9.9
Nose tip position2.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.7 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

6.1
Chin to philtrum ratio2.80

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.60

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.37

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.78

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.44

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

3.4
Mouth corner position1.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.78%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle10.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.7 / 10

Jaw slope140.3 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

9.1
Bigonial width87.16%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion30.15%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle95.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.2
Neck width75.72%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.3/ 10 harmony
Kristina Pimenova side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.9 / 10

Browridge inclination11.2 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

4.2
Nasofrontal angle133.6 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

3.3
Upper forehead slope5.1 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

7.2

Profile convexity

6.2 / 10

Z angle70.7 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity145.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-2.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

2.1
Facial convexity (glabella)164.7 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

3.9
Anterior facial depth71.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

7.6
Facial convexity (nasion)159.9 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

9.8
Facial depth to height1.47

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

7.8
Interior midface projection62.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

8.8

Nose

8.9 / 10

Nasal width to height0.69

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle115.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle133.5 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation28.2 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.8 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.8 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

8.8 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)-0.1 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.3 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

9.9
Upper lip (E-line)2.2 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-0.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

8.5
Holdaway H line-1.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

3.0

Chin and jaw

7.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle134.4 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

9.9
Recession relative to Frankfort-7.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle120.5 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle22.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.53

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

7.6
Gonion to mouth line9.5 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

4.6

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle116.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface compactness

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to cheekbone width and midface height sitting in classical proportion.

Face width to height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow length

10.0

This contributes to a framed eye area due to the brows spanning the eyes in proportion to the face.

Brow length to face width (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Tall forehead

-0.24

The forehead takes up more of the face than ideal, drawing attention away from the eyes and midface.

Top third (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.21

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.19

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Recessed chin

-0.19

The chin falls behind the nasion perpendicular, which reads as a weak chin in profile.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.18

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.