Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Kit Harington - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - Game of Thrones, Eternals, Pompeii

Kit Harington runs on an even stack and a strong midface: thirds that divide cleanly, high cheekbones over a long face, a nose that runs clean in profile, and lips that sit right on the line with the fullness to carry them. It loosens front-on, with a nose that sits off centre, flat brows over close-set eyes on almost no tilt, mouth corners that turn down, and no line from jaw into neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
English
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.0 / 10
Kit Harington front portrait
Kit Harington side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Kit Harington's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.3

out of 10

Top 21%

Side view

5.6

out of 10

Top 41%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.3/ 10 harmony
Kit Harington front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.8 / 10

Top third30.61%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third31.75%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third37.63%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.5

Face shape

7.8 / 10

Face width to height1.94

Ideal 1.96 to 2

9.7
Bitemporal width84.71%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.4
Midface ratio0.97

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
0.0
Cheekbone height87.15%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.7 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

2.9
Eyebrow low setedness0.83

Ideal 0 to 0.45

6.4
Eye aspect ratio3.29

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio43.33%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

2.6
One eye apart test1.18

Ideal 0.95 to 1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt-0.5 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.4

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle82.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA16.5 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.03

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.8
Intercanthal to nasal width1.12

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position2.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.5 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

2.9
Chin to philtrum ratio2.39

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.54

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.34

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.76

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

6.1
Mouth to nose width1.21

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

0.0
Mouth corner position-1.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

3.7

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.13%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.7 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.1 / 10

Jaw slope137.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

7.3
Bigonial width88.26%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion31.78%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle98.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

4.9
Neck width88.68%

Ideal 92 to 98

8.5

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.6/ 10 harmony
Kit Harington side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

7.1 / 10

Browridge inclination16.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle132.1 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

7.3
Upper forehead slope5.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

3.9

Profile convexity

6.5 / 10

Z angle75.7 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

7.1
Total facial convexity147.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.9
Orbital vector-3.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)169.7 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.9
Anterior facial depth72.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

4.9
Facial convexity (nasion)165.9 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

10.0
Facial depth to height1.36

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection68.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

7.4 / 10

Nasal width to height0.73

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

2.6
Nasolabial angle100.4 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle146.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

0.0
Nasomental angle133.8 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.2
Nasofacial angle31.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation24.9 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

5.7
Mid nose projection0.6 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.9
Frankfort tip angle39.9 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.5

Lips

9.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.3 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.6 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)0.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)1.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

6.5
Upper lip (E-line)4.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)3.8 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line1.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

9.9

Chin and jaw

3.2 / 10

Mentolabial angle142.8 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-6.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.2
Gonial angle132.6 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.0
Mandibular plane angle28.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.75

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line13.0 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

9.2

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle137.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip riding slightly above the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.35

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Flat eyebrow tilt

-0.29

The brows rise little toward their peaks, which can read heavy or tired.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.29

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Soft chin-neck definition

-0.28

The angle under the chin is open, which reads as a soft or receding under-chin area.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.24

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.