Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Kate Moss - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Calvin Klein, Rimmel, Topshop

Kate Moss lives in profile, with a straight bridge running to a well-placed tip, lips sitting right on the line, ears flat to the head and a clean chin crease under tilted brows. Head-on the face gives way, with round eyes set wide apart, a small mouth set low under a strong, forward nose, wide temples and a jaw that runs into the neck.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
English
Eyes:
Blue-green
Harmony:
6.4 / 10
Kate Moss front portrait
Kate Moss side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Kate Moss's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.3

out of 10

Top 21%

Side view

6.6

out of 10

Top 12%

Best looking out of 6 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.3/ 10 harmony
Kate Moss front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.2 / 10

Top third34.70%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

7.5
Middle third33.63%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third31.67%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

10.0

Face shape

6.1 / 10

Face width to height1.89

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

7.4
Bitemporal width92.22%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.14

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

3.8
9.4
Cheekbone height89.10%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.6 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt10.7 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

5.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.80

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio1.99

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio51.83%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

0.0
One eye apart test1.40

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt14.9 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.59

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

6.8

Nose

9.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle88.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA3.6 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

9.2
Nose bridge to nose width2.11

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width0.96

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position0.7 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

6.3 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.8
Chin to philtrum ratio1.86

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

2.8
Lower to upper lip ratio1.45

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.6
Lip fullness0.42

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.67

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

3.9
Mouth to nose width1.29

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

0.0
Mouth corner position0.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.87%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle10.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.1 / 10

Jaw slope147.2 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

7.3
Bigonial width81.67%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

8.0
Lower third proportion37.01%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle91.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width78.31%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.6/ 10 harmony
Kate Moss side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

4.6 / 10

Browridge inclination23.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

6.4
Nasofrontal angle130.4 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope5.1 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

7.3

Profile convexity

7.6 / 10

Z angle71.2 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.7
Total facial convexity143.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-0.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

8.3
Facial convexity (glabella)170.0 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth66.5 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)161.9 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

10.0
Facial depth to height1.50

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

2.1
Interior midface projection58.6 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.2 / 10

Nasal width to height0.81

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.84

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle100.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle127.9 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.9
Nasomental angle123.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

5.4
Nasofacial angle41.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.0
Nose tip rotation30.8 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.9
Mid nose projection-1.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.3 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

10.0

Lips

8.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-3.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.2
Upper lip (S-line)-1.3 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-1.9 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

8.7
Upper lip (E-line)1.4 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-0.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

7.7
Holdaway H line-1.1 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

4.6

Chin and jaw

7.8 / 10

Mentolabial angle125.3 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-4.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle116.0 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

8.9
Mandibular plane angle19.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.58

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.7
Gonion to mouth line11.3 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

8.3

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle126.3 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal facial convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.

Total facial convexity (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin crease

10.0

This contributes to a defined chin due to the lip-chin transition being defined but soft.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Upper lip (E-line) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.36

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

Wide-set eyes

-0.33

The eyes are far apart for the width of the face, creating a wide or stretched midface appearance.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.33

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Low-set mouth

-0.32

The mouth sits low in the lower third, which shortens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Wide intercanthal spacing

-0.31

There is more than one eye-width of space between the eyes, which reads wide-set.

One eye apart test (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Kate Moss's strongest and weakest features

Kate Moss scores 6.43 overall, with an even front and side (6.30 and 6.64). Her profile and brows are her strongest features, and her costs come from the mouth width, wide-set eyes, the eye shape and the lower face.

From the front, her middle and lower thirds are in band and her cheekbones sit high. Her brows are set low and tilted correctly. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is ideal, her nose is sized correctly to the space between her eyes, and its tip sits level with her nostrils. Her mouth corners sit well, the angle where the two sides of her jaw meet and her neck width are ideal, and her ears sit flat. In profile, her facial convexity and facial depth are in band, her nose length, nasolabial angle, bridge line and the incline of the underside of her nose are ideal, her midface carries her nose base forward correctly, her upper lip sits on the Burstone, S-line and E-line references, and her mentolabial angle and jaw plane are ideal.

Her largest cost is a narrow mouth for her nose, at 1.29 nose widths where 1.52 to 1.6 is ideal, which is her weakest single metric at 2.10 out of 10. Her eyes sit wide, with pupils 51.8% of the face width apart against 46.5 to 47.5%, and set wide for their length, at 1.40 against 1.05 to 1.1. Her eye openings read round, at an aspect ratio of 1.99 against 2.77 to 3.36. Her upper lip is long, taking up 37% of the lower third against 31 to 33.5%, and her temples are wide, at 92.2% of her cheekbone width against 80.1 to 85.7%.