Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Justin Timberlake - Facial Harmony Analysis

Singer and actor - NSYNC, SexyBack, Cry Me a River, The Social Network

Justin Timberlake reads strongest head-on and through the upper face, with a straight line from brow to nose tip, cheekbones set at the right height, an even jaw that holds its width out to the corners and thirds that stack cleanly. The lower profile is the price, with both lips set well back of the nose-to-chin line, a flat crease beneath the lower lip, a rounded jaw corner and a soft line from jaw to neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
6.6 / 10
Justin Timberlake front portrait
Justin Timberlake side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Justin Timberlake's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.5

out of 10

Top 1.5%

Side view

5.2

out of 10

Top 48%

Best looking out of 8 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.5/ 10 harmony
Justin Timberlake front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third32.20%

Ideal 30 to 32

9.9
Middle third31.88%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.92%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

8.1 / 10

Face width to height1.89

Ideal 1.96 to 2

4.3
Bitemporal width95.58%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.3
Midface ratio1.06

Ideal 0.97 to 1

8.1
10.0
Cheekbone height89.49%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt3.7 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

2.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.77

Ideal 0 to 0.45

7.6
Eye aspect ratio2.88

Ideal 3 to 3.5

8.7
Eye separation ratio47.71%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

8.3
One eye apart test1.21

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

4.8
Eyebrow tilt5.6 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

9.6
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.4

Nose

7.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle87.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA1.0 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

10.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.20

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

8.8
Intercanthal to nasal width1.15

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position4.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

0.0

Mouth and lips

6.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.2
Chin to philtrum ratio3.07

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.67

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.28

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

8.1
Interpupillary to mouth width0.80

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.3
Mouth to nose width1.34

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

5.5
Mouth corner position1.1 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

7.6 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.24%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle13.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

5.2

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.0 / 10

Jaw slope142.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width88.38%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion27.39%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle88.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width90.98%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.2/ 10 harmony
Justin Timberlake side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.8 / 10

Browridge inclination17.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle122.1 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope3.2 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

9.3

Profile convexity

5.7 / 10

Z angle85.5 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

6.1
Total facial convexity153.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

5.5
Orbital vector1.6 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)178.4 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

3.3
Anterior facial depth70.0 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

8.7
Facial convexity (nasion)176.1 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.62

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

1.7
Interior midface projection58.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

7.1 / 10

Nasal width to height0.82

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.9
Nasolabial angle81.7 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

5.7
Nasal tip angle133.8 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle137.3 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

5.1
Nasofacial angle27.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

4.7
Nose tip rotation18.9 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

10.0
Mid nose projection1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.5
Frankfort tip angle35.1 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

10.0

Lips

3.6 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)0.5 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

6.4
Upper lip (S-line)4.0 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)4.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.9 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)7.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

1.2
Holdaway H line1.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

7.9

Chin and jaw

6.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle148.8 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort17.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.9
Gonial angle134.9 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

0.0
Mandibular plane angle19.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.73

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line21.8 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle126.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nasofrontal angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the forehead flowing into the nose at a classical angle.

Nasofrontal angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal tip position

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting classically on the levelled head.

Frankfort tip angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose tip definition

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip being defined without being pinched.

Nasal tip angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear set

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears sitting close to the head.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip ratio

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lower lip being classically fuller than the upper.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.36

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.32

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeSide view

Concave profile

-0.25

The profile runs flat to concave at the nose base, which can read as a prominent chin or flat midface.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

severeSide view

Open jaw angle

-0.25

The jaw corner is open and sloped, which softens jawline definition.

Gonial angle (side view)

severeSide view

Soft chin-neck definition

-0.23

The angle under the chin is open, which reads as a soft or receding under-chin area.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Justin Timberlake's strongest and weakest features

Justin Timberlake scores 6.62 overall, and his front clearly outscores his profile: 7.47 front against 5.22 side. His jaw seen head-on is his strongest feature, and his costs come from the lower face proportions and the jaw, chin and neck in profile.

From the front, his middle and lower thirds are in band, his full face is ideally proportioned for its width, and his cheekbones sit high. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is ideal and matches his jaw angle, as the ideal asks, and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His lips are sized correctly to each other, his mouth corners sit well, and his ears sit flat. His jaw is clean head-on: his jaw slope, bigonial width and the angle where the two sides of his jaw meet are ideal. In profile, his brow ridge, the step from his brow to his nose and his orbital vector are in band, his nose length, tip angle, tip rotation and the incline of the underside of his nose are ideal, his midface carries his nose base forward correctly, his upper lip sits on the Burstone reference, and his jaw plane, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are ideal.

His largest cost is a short upper lip, taking up 27.4% of the lower third where 31 to 33.5% is ideal, which is his weakest single metric at 1.17 out of 10, and his chin runs long to match, at 3.07 times his philtrum against 2.15 to 2.45. Measured at the nose base, his profile is flatter than ideal, at 176.1 degrees against 163 to 166. His jaw corner is softer than ideal, at 134.9 degrees against 115 to 121, and his jaw eases into his neck at 126 degrees against 94 to 106. The fold between his lower lip and chin is shallow, at 148.8 degrees against 111 to 127.