Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Julia Stiles - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - 10 Things I Hate About You, The Bourne Identity, Save the Last Dance

Julia Stiles carries an even forehead, high cheekbones, strongly tilted brows and a wide, well-placed mouth under a well-shaped nose. The lower face is where it gives way, with a long chin block under thin lips, wide temples, wide-spaced eyes and a chin that sits back behind a flat profile.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
5.3 / 10
Julia Stiles front portrait
Julia Stiles side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Julia Stiles's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.6

out of 10

Top 40%

Side view

4.9

out of 10

Bottom 49%

Best looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.6/ 10 harmony
Julia Stiles front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.4 / 10

Top third32.81%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third31.54%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

9.2
Lower third35.65%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

5.0 / 10

Face width to height1.91

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

9.3
Bitemporal width93.56%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.13

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

5.7
0.0
Cheekbone height87.16%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.4 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

7.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.98

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

9.9
Eye aspect ratio3.05

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

10.0
Eye separation ratio49.27%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

2.5
One eye apart test1.20

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

6.2
Eyebrow tilt13.3 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

10.0
Brow length to face width0.67

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

10.0

Nose

9.3 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle90.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA3.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

9.7
Nose bridge to nose width2.22

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.10

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

8.8
Nose tip position3.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

8.2

Mouth and lips

3.5 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.6
Chin to philtrum ratio3.87

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.23

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

0.0
Lip fullness0.24

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

0.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.92

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

0.0
Mouth to nose width1.60

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.3 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.05%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

8.6

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.4 / 10

Jaw slope139.5 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

8.0
Bigonial width89.03%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.8
Lower third proportion22.84%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle93.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Neck width82.70%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

9.4

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.9/ 10 harmony
Julia Stiles side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

5.5 / 10

Browridge inclination19.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle130.6 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

0.0
Upper forehead slope4.9 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

6.5

Profile convexity

2.7 / 10

Z angle85.9 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity157.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector-1.7 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

3.4
Facial convexity (glabella)178.8 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

0.0
Anterior facial depth70.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

8.7
Facial convexity (nasion)172.8 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.62

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection62.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.1

Nose

5.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.68

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.71

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

2.9
Nasolabial angle112.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle138.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle139.8 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

0.0
Nasofacial angle28.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.9
Nose tip rotation40.6 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

0.0
Mid nose projection-2.0 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

8.1
Frankfort tip angle48.7 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.1

Lips

8.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.7 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.7 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

9.9
Upper lip (S-line)1.5 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

5.5
Lower lip (S-line)1.6 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

5.6
Upper lip (E-line)4.6 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)3.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.8 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

9.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle140.8 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

6.0
Recession relative to Frankfort6.2 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle125.0 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

9.9
Mandibular plane angle18.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.59

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.8
Gonion to mouth line14.0 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle93.8 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

9.9

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal jawline slope

10.0

This contributes to a defined profile due to the jawline running at a classical slope from corner to chin.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye shape

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the eye opening being neither overly round nor overly narrow.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal chin position

10.0

This contributes to a strong profile due to the chin sitting classically on the nasion perpendicular.

Recession relative to Frankfort (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Lower lip (E-line) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.46

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.43

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Thin lips

-0.37

The lips are shallow for the width of the mouth, which reads as a thin mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

severeFront view

Heavy lower lip

-0.31

The lower lip is much fuller than the upper, which can unbalance the mouth.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.30

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Julia Stiles's strongest and weakest features

Julia Stiles scores 5.32 overall, and her front outscores her profile: 5.59 front against 4.88 side. Her eye area and nose are her strongest features, and her costs are concentrated in the lower face.

From the front, her upper third is in band and her cheekbones sit high. Her eyes have an ideal aspect ratio, and her brows are tilted correctly and the right length for the face. The angle from the base of her nose to her outer eye corners is ideal, her nose bridge is proportioned to her nostrils, and her mouth is the right width for her nose, with mouth corners that sit well. Her ears sit flat. In profile, her brow ridge is in band, her nose angles are ideal, her lips sit on the Burstone, E-line and Holdaway references, her chin sits at the right depth, and her jaw plane and jaw corner height are ideal.

Her largest cost is a very short upper lip: it takes up only 22.8% of the lower third where 31 to 33.5% is ideal, which is her weakest single metric at 0.12 out of 10. Her chin runs long to match, at 3.87 times her philtrum against 2.15 to 2.45. Her lips are thin, at 0.24 against 0.342 to 0.418 for women, and her lower lip is full relative to her upper lip, at 2.23 against 1.55 to 1.85. Her temples are wide, at 93.6% of her cheekbone width against 80.1 to 85.7%. In profile, her face is deep for its height, at 1.62 against 1.3 to 1.44.