Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Josh Hutcherson - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The Hunger Games, Five Nights at Freddy's, Bridge to Terabithia

Josh Hutcherson has a well-proportioned lower face, a high cheek line, long almond eyes and ears that sit tight to the head. The lip line is the weak point, with both lips carried forward of the profile, a shallow chin crease and a jaw corner too soft to echo the eye line.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
5.9 / 10
Josh Hutcherson front portrait
Josh Hutcherson side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Josh Hutcherson's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.5

out of 10

Top 43%

Side view

6.5

out of 10

Top 15%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.5/ 10 harmony
Josh Hutcherson front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.6 / 10

Top third29.55%

Ideal 30 to 32

9.6
Middle third34.15%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.1
Lower third36.30%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

7.8 / 10

Face width to height1.80

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width94.20%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.6
Midface ratio0.96

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
9.7
Cheekbone height85.73%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.7 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt1.9 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.98

Ideal 0 to 0.45

3.2
Eye aspect ratio3.43

Ideal 3 to 3.5

10.0
Eye separation ratio45.56%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.9
One eye apart test1.31

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

0.0
Eyebrow tilt2.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

1.8
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

7.7

Nose

8.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle88.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA18.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.17

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

9.8
Intercanthal to nasal width1.09

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position2.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

4.4 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.4 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

1.4
Chin to philtrum ratio2.75

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio2.21

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

2.9
Lip fullness0.27

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

5.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.82

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.30

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

1.5
Mouth corner position0.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.89%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle10.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

3.9 / 10

Jaw slope134.2 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

0.3
Bigonial width85.86%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.2
Lower third proportion27.61%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle106.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width92.64%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.5/ 10 harmony
Josh Hutcherson side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.9 / 10

Browridge inclination17.0 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle129.6 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

9.7
Upper forehead slope1.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

7.2 / 10

Z angle80.3 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

10.0
Total facial convexity143.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-1.7 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

4.1
Facial convexity (glabella)177.6 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

6.0
Anterior facial depth67.8 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)174.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.50

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

9.0
Interior midface projection61.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

8.5

Nose

8.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.78

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.78

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.3
Nasolabial angle105.9 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle129.4 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle131.4 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.9
Nasofacial angle31.5 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation24.8 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

6.0
Mid nose projection-0.9 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle38.1 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.9

Lips

4.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.5 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.7
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.0 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

8.8
Upper lip (S-line)4.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)3.8 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.3 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)6.3 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

6.0
Holdaway H line1.0 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

6.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle152.3 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort-7.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle123.7 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

8.1
Mandibular plane angle22.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.8
Ramus to mandible ratio0.65

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line17.8 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle124.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal nasolabial angle

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose-lip transition due to the angle under the nose sitting in its classical range.

Nasolabial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal facial convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection sitting in proportion with forehead and chin.

Total facial convexity (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile line

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the chin and lips falling on a classical line.

Z angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal ear angle

10.0

This contributes to a clean facial outline due to the ears angling close to the head.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.41

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.38

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.37

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Square lower face

-0.30

The jawlines run wide apart, which squares the lower face.

Jaw frontal angle (front view)

severeFront view

Negative canthal tilt

-0.28

The outer eye corners sit low, which can read as tired or downturned eyes.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.