Celebrity analysis

How attractive is John Krasinski - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor and director - The Office, A Quiet Place, Jack Ryan

The nose is well proportioned from both angles, set cleanly off the face and the lip with the tip placed right, over a jaw that keeps its width at the corners and a narrow neck. The face is long and narrow with a short forehead over a long midface, ears that carry well off the head, high flat brows with little support under the eyes, and a chin set back on a jaw that slopes down steeply into a soft neckline.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Polish-Irish American
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
4.5 / 10
John Krasinski front portrait
John Krasinski side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

John Krasinski's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

4.3

out of 10

Bottom 38%

Side view

4.8

out of 10

Bottom 48%

Worst looking out of 2 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.3/ 10 harmony
John Krasinski front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third25.26%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.0
Middle third38.09%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

0.0
Lower third36.65%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

4.4 / 10

Face width to height1.48

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width88.41%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.87

Ideal 0.97 to 1

2.2
0.0
Cheekbone height87.02%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

4.2 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt4.8 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

8.0
Eyebrow low setedness1.17

Ideal 0 to 0.45

0.0
Eye aspect ratio2.67

Ideal 3 to 3.5

1.0
Eye separation ratio47.48%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.2
One eye apart test1.00

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

1.8
Eyebrow tilt-1.8 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

0.0
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.3

Nose

6.9 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle83.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

3.8
Deviation of IAA and JFA4.9 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

8.5
Nose bridge to nose width1.91

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

2.1
Intercanthal to nasal width1.13

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position2.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.0 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

3.6
Chin to philtrum ratio2.08

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.4
Lower to upper lip ratio1.81

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.30

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.9
Interpupillary to mouth width0.76

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

5.7
Mouth to nose width1.35

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

7.0
Mouth corner position0.9 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

0.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio15.51%

Ideal 8 to 12

0.0
Ear protrusion angle16.0 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

10.0 / 10

Jaw slope143.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.9
Bigonial width88.11%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion33.09%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle88.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width96.58%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

4.8/ 10 harmony
John Krasinski side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.7 / 10

Browridge inclination6.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Nasofrontal angle128.1 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

9.9
Upper forehead slope1.3 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

5.9 / 10

Z angle73.8 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

1.4
Total facial convexity138.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.5
Orbital vector-2.4 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

1.0
Facial convexity (glabella)171.5 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

10.0
Anterior facial depth62.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

8.0
Facial convexity (nasion)168.3 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

7.2
Facial depth to height1.30

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

10.0
Interior midface projection72.7 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

8.6 / 10

Nasal width to height0.74

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.68

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

9.9
Nasolabial angle98.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle137.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle127.0 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle34.4 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation11.2 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

9.9
Mid nose projection1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.2
Frankfort tip angle24.1 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

5.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.5 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.0 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)3.1 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

1.1
Upper lip (E-line)8.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)5.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

8.7
Holdaway H line0.2 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

3.6 / 10

Mentolabial angle138.7 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

1.8
Recession relative to Frankfort-13.0 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

0.0
Gonial angle115.7 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle32.8 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.72

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line7.3 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

0.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle130.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.

Upper lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.

Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal forehead contour

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant profile due to the forehead curving gently between brow and hairline.

Upper forehead slope (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.67

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Short forehead

-0.38

The forehead takes up less of the face than ideal, which can make the lower features read heavy.

Top third (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.37

The ears stand out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Flat eyebrow tilt

-0.36

The brows rise little toward their peaks, which can read heavy or tired.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

severeFront view

Long midface

-0.35

The midface takes up more than its classical share, which can stretch the eye-to-mouth region.

Middle third (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

John Krasinski's strongest and weakest features

John Krasinski scores 4.50 overall, 4.32 front and 4.78 side. His jaw and nose are his strongest features, and his costs come from the length of the midface, the forehead, the ears and the brows.

From the front, his lower third, temples and cheekbones are in band, and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His lips are sized correctly to each other and his mouth corners sit well. His jaw is clean head-on: his bigonial width, the split of his lower third between lip and chin, the angle where the two sides of his jaw meet, and his neck width are all ideal. In profile, his forehead slope, facial convexity and facial depth are in band, his nose angles are ideal, his lips sit on the Burstone and Holdaway references, and his jaw corner angle and rear jaw length are ideal.

His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.48 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.67 of a point and is his weakest single metric. His middle third takes up 38.1% of the face against 31.4 to 33.4%, while his forehead is short, at 25.3% against 30 to 32%. His ears stand out on both measures: they protrude at a ratio of 15.51 against 8 to 12, and they are angled out at 16 degrees against 10 to 11.5. His brows tilt slightly downward, at -1.8 degrees where 6.5 to 11 is ideal.