Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Joe Bartolozzi - Facial Harmony Analysis

Creator - TikTok comedy, YouTube, Twitch

Joe Bartolozzi is jaw-forward, with a sharp jaw corner, a long line from the corner to the mouth and lips sitting exactly on the profile line under a well-angled nose. The weaker notes are ears that swing wide, a flat run through the midface, a short lower third and a jaw that reads blunt across the front.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Italian-American
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
6.6 / 10
Joe Bartolozzi front portrait
Joe Bartolozzi side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Joe Bartolozzi's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.5

out of 10

Top 14%

Side view

6.7

out of 10

Top 10%

Best looking out of 8 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.5/ 10 harmony
Joe Bartolozzi front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.4 / 10

Top third31.66%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third30.57%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.0
Lower third37.77%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

9.3

Face shape

7.8 / 10

Face width to height1.87

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.5
Bitemporal width94.73%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.2
Midface ratio0.97

Ideal 0.97 to 1

10.0
9.3
Cheekbone height85.75%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.1 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt2.5 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

0.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.78

Ideal 0 to 0.45

7.3
Eye aspect ratio2.98

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio44.88%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.2
One eye apart test1.23

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

2.7
Eyebrow tilt7.0 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.60

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

3.4

Nose

5.8 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle86.6 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA13.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.38

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.20

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.4
Nose tip position-0.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

9.5

Mouth and lips

7.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

7.6
Chin to philtrum ratio2.52

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.3
Lower to upper lip ratio1.98

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.2
Lip fullness0.34

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.79

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

8.4
Mouth to nose width1.25

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

0.0
Mouth corner position0.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.40%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle16.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.6 / 10

Jaw slope136.6 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

6.2
Bigonial width86.96%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion29.59%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle100.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

1.7
Neck width92.39%

Ideal 92 to 98

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.7/ 10 harmony
Joe Bartolozzi side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

6.6 / 10

Browridge inclination16.3 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle135.4 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

1.7
Upper forehead slope3.7 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

8.3

Profile convexity

5.9 / 10

Z angle82.2 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.9
Total facial convexity151.3 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

8.2
Orbital vector-3.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)177.2 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

7.2
Anterior facial depth69.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.0
Facial convexity (nasion)174.4 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.61

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

2.9
Interior midface projection59.9 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

6.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.70

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.74

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

5.3
Nasolabial angle109.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle142.6 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

4.4
Nasomental angle137.5 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

4.8
Nasofacial angle28.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

7.1
Nose tip rotation28.4 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-0.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.7 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.0

Lips

7.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)2.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

2.3
Lower lip (S-line)0.4 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)6.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

9.8
Lower lip (E-line)3.0 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line-1.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.7

Chin and jaw

8.7 / 10

Mentolabial angle137.9 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

2.7
Recession relative to Frankfort1.7 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle116.9 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle13.1 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.7
Ramus to mandible ratio0.75

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line31.2 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle118.6 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Ideal jaw corner height

10.0

This contributes to a defined jawline due to the jaw corner sitting at a classical height against the mouth.

Gonion to mouth line (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Lower lip (E-line) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (S-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting on Steiner's S-line.

Lower lip (S-line) (side view)

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw angle

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the jaw not lacking definition or being overly sharp at its corner.

Gonial angle (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.33

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.30

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.25

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.24

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Narrow mouth for the nose

-0.24

The mouth is barely wider than the nose base, which can make the nose read wide.

Mouth to nose width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Joe Bartolozzi's strongest and weakest features

Joe Bartolozzi scores 6.61 overall, with an even front and side (6.54 and 6.72). His lips and lower profile are his strongest features, and his costs come from the ears, the nose and mouth widths, and the eye tilt.

From the front, his upper third is in band, his midface is proportioned to his eye spacing, and his cheekbones sit high. His brows are tilted correctly, and the angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is ideal. His lips are full, his mouth corners sit well, and his neck width is ideal. In profile, his brow ridge is in band, his nose length, nose angle to the lip and bridge line are ideal, his midface carries his nose base forward correctly, his lips sit on the Burstone, S-line and E-line references, his chin sits at the right depth, and his jaw corner angle and jaw corner height are ideal.

His largest cost is ear protrusion: his ears are angled out at 16.4 degrees where 10 to 11.5 is ideal, which takes about 0.33 of a point. His jaw angle and the angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners differ by 13.8 degrees, against an ideal of 2.5 or less. His nose bridge reads narrow against the width of his nostrils, at 2.38 against 2.06 to 2.14, and his mouth is narrow for his nose, at 1.25 nose widths against 1.42 to 1.5. His upper lip is slightly short, taking up 29.6% of the lower third against 31 to 33.5%, and his outer eye corners tilt up only 2.5 degrees where 6 to 7.7 is ideal.