Celebrity analysis

How attractive is India Eisley - Facial Harmony Analysis

Actor - The Secret Life of the American Teenager, I Am the Night, Underworld: Awakening

India Eisley has evenly split facial thirds, well-spaced eyes, high cheekbones, full lips and a well-balanced nose. Her eyes are round with a flat tilt, her midface runs long under wide temples, her jaw runs flat and her lips sit back behind a strongly projecting nose.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Argentine, Scottish and American
Eyes:
Green
Harmony:
8.1 / 10
India Eisley front portrait
India Eisley side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

India Eisley's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.09%

Side view

8.0

out of 10

Top 0.1%

Best looking out of 900 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
India Eisley front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.3 / 10

Top third33.30%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third32.67%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third34.03%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

7.8

Face shape

3.6 / 10

Face width to height2.04

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

3.8
Bitemporal width91.37%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

0.0
Midface ratio1.16

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

1.9
2.1
Cheekbone height88.95%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

7.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.2 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

6.8
Eyebrow low setedness0.78

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.28

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

0.0
Eye separation ratio46.57%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

10.0
One eye apart test1.23

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

2.9
Eyebrow tilt9.1 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

9.0
Brow length to face width0.64

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.9

Nose

9.7 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle93.2 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.9
Deviation of IAA and JFA3.3 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

9.5
Nose bridge to nose width2.08

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.3
Intercanthal to nasal width1.01

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

10.0
Nose tip position0.4 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.2 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.6 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

4.5
Chin to philtrum ratio2.21

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.69

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.46

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

6.8
Interpupillary to mouth width0.79

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

9.9
Mouth to nose width1.46

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

6.4
Mouth corner position-0.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.7

Ears

9.7 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.93%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle12.5 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.3

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.1 / 10

Jaw slope139.3 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

7.8
Bigonial width87.05%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion33.56%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

9.9
Jaw frontal angle96.5 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

7.8
Neck width73.68%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.0/ 10 harmony
India Eisley side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.0 / 10

Browridge inclination20.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle135.6 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

6.9
Upper forehead slope6.9 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

8.3 / 10

Z angle76.9 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

10.0
Total facial convexity146.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector1.1 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)171.3 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth65.2 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

10.0
Facial convexity (nasion)166.2 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

6.5
Facial depth to height1.62

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection53.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

8.8 / 10

Nasal width to height0.73

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.76

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

0.0
Nasolabial angle99.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle131.0 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle129.7 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle32.8 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation26.8 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-1.6 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

9.7
Frankfort tip angle39.1 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

9.9

Lips

7.7 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-3.8 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-4.2 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

8.1
Upper lip (S-line)-0.1 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)-2.0 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

8.0
Upper lip (E-line)2.7 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)-0.4 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

7.7
Holdaway H line-2.0 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

0.0

Chin and jaw

7.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle141.1 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

5.6
Recession relative to Frankfort1.5 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle115.5 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

8.1
Mandibular plane angle10.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

0.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.63

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line23.0 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

9.4 / 10

Submental cervical angle108.5 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

9.4

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lip ratio

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lower lip being classically fuller than the upper.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nasofacial angle

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to the nose lifting off the facial plane at a classical angle.

Nasofacial angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal profile convexity

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to brow, nose base, and chin falling in a gently convex line.

Facial convexity (glabella) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal jaw corner height

10.0

This contributes to a defined jawline due to the jaw corner sitting at a classical height against the mouth.

Gonion to mouth line (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal upper lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically on Burstone's line.

Upper lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeSide view

Deep face for its height

-0.23

The face carries far back for its height, which can read heavy in profile.

Facial depth to height (side view)

severeFront view

Round eyes

-0.20

The eye opening is tall for its width, which reads rounder than the classical almond shape.

Eye aspect ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Wide forehead

-0.19

The temples are wide against the cheekbones, which makes the upper face read heavy.

Bitemporal width (front view)

severeSide view

Flat mandibular plane

-0.18

The jawline runs flatter than the reference range for this measure.

Mandibular plane angle (side view)

severeSide view

Over-projected nose tip

-0.15

The tip projects far for the bridge length, which can dominate the profile.

Nasal projection (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.