Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Hernan Drago - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and TV host - Hugo Boss campaigns, Bienvenidos a bordo, El show creativo

Hernan Drago is a front-on face, with thirds that split evenly, very high cheekbones, upward-tilted eyes under even brows and a jaw squared off at a clean corner. The profile is where it gives, with a flat brow-to-nose line, a nose carrying far forward, lips sitting ahead of the nose and chin, and no jaw-to-neck line.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Argentine
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
7.9 / 10
Hernan Drago front portrait
Hernan Drago side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Hernan Drago's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.7

out of 10

Top 0.003%

Side view

6.7

out of 10

Top 12%

Best looking out of 400 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.7/ 10 harmony
Hernan Drago front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

10.0 / 10

Top third32.00%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third32.46%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

10.0
Lower third35.54%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

10.0

Face shape

8.1 / 10

Face width to height1.87

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.9
Bitemporal width88.13%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio0.95

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.6
9.9
Cheekbone height92.48%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.5 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.7 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.55

Ideal 0 to 0.45

9.8
Eye aspect ratio2.82

Ideal 3 to 3.5

7.1
Eye separation ratio44.79%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

9.0
One eye apart test1.22

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

3.8
Eyebrow tilt10.7 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.66

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.5

Nose

6.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle78.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA11.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.12

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

10.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.17

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.9
Nose tip position1.3 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

8.9 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.1 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.8
Chin to philtrum ratio2.64

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

4.7
Lower to upper lip ratio1.36

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.5
Lip fullness0.29

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

9.4
Interpupillary to mouth width0.83

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.40

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.9
Mouth corner position2.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

9.9 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio8.41%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle9.1 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.8

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.8 / 10

Jaw slope138.5 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

9.4
Bigonial width91.07%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

10.0
Lower third proportion30.83%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

9.8
Jaw frontal angle90.3 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Neck width91.63%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.7/ 10 harmony
Hernan Drago side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.2 / 10

Browridge inclination25.7 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

8.6
Nasofrontal angle130.7 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

8.9
Upper forehead slope1.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

6.8 / 10

Z angle87.0 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

2.6
Total facial convexity147.9 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.9
Orbital vector2.8 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)175.8 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.7
Anterior facial depth61.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

5.5
Facial convexity (nasion)172.8 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.55

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

7.0
Interior midface projection52.5 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.9

Nose

7.5 / 10

Nasal width to height0.76

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.79

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

0.0
Nasolabial angle107.2 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle124.3 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

5.4
Nasomental angle132.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.8
Nasofacial angle30.9 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

9.9
Nose tip rotation26.1 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

2.7
Mid nose projection-0.8 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle40.2 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

9.4

Lips

2.1 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-0.9 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

5.4
Lower lip (Burstone)1.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

1.8
Upper lip (S-line)4.3 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)4.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)7.6 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

0.2
Holdaway H line1.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

7.1

Chin and jaw

9.4 / 10

Mentolabial angle134.4 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

6.5
Recession relative to Frankfort3.6 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle118.6 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle14.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.63

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line24.7 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

0.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle125.2 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

0.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal lower third

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower face due to the mouth, chin, and jaw holding their classical share of face height.

Lower third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose proportions

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to its projection and height sitting in classical proportion.

Nasal width to height (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose tip height

10.0

This contributes to a refined nose due to the tip sitting just below the nostril line.

Nose tip position (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow alar angle

-0.25

The angle from the nose base to the eye corners is tight, which reads as a long midface or close-set eyes.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.21

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeSide view

Soft chin-neck definition

-0.21

The angle under the chin is open, which reads as a soft or receding under-chin area.

Submental cervical angle (side view)

severeSide view

Concave profile

-0.18

The profile runs flat to concave at the nose base, which can read as a prominent chin or flat midface.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

severeSide view

Recessed lower lip

-0.15

The lower lip falls behind the S-line, which can read flat.

Lower lip (S-line) (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Hernan Drago's strongest and weakest features

Hernan Drago scores 7.92 overall, and his front clearly outscores his profile: 8.69 front against 6.67 side. His facial thirds, eye area and jaw are his strongest features, and his costs come from the angle of the nose base seen head-on and from the lower profile.

From the front, all three facial thirds are in band, his temples are in proportion, and his cheekbones sit high. His outer eye corners tilt correctly and his brows are tilted correctly. His nose bridge is proportioned to his nostrils, his mouth is the right width for his pupil distance, and his mouth corners sit well. His jaw is strong head-on: his bigonial width and the angle where the two sides of his jaw meet are ideal, and his ears sit flat. In profile, his forehead slope and orbital vector are in band, his nose angle to the lip and bridge line are ideal, his chin sits at the right depth, and his jaw corner angle, rear jaw length and jaw corner height are all ideal.

His largest cost is a narrow angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners, at 78.9 degrees where 86.5 to 92.5 is ideal, and it differs from his jaw angle by 11.4 degrees against an ideal of 2.5 or less. In profile, his jaw eases into his neck rather than meeting it at a clean angle, at 125.2 degrees against 94 to 106, and his profile is flatter than ideal, measured at the nose base, at 172.8 degrees against 163 to 166. His lower lip sits 4.9mm ahead of the S-line against -0.4 to 1.4mm, which is his weakest single metric at 0.91 out of 10. His midface reads slightly long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.87 against 1.96 to 2.