Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Hailey Bieber - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model and entrepreneur - founder of Rhode skincare

Hailey Bieber has high cheekbones, full lips, a balanced nose and chin, and a clean jaw-to-neck line on a well-shaped profile. Her face runs long with a short forehead and a long midface, her brows sit flat, her mouth runs narrow for her eye spacing and her cheeks sit flat under the eyes.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
Brazilian, English, Irish, Scottish, Italian and French-Canadian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
6.9 / 10
Hailey Bieber front portrait
Hailey Bieber side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Hailey Bieber's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

6.2

out of 10

Top 24%

Side view

8.1

out of 10

Top 0.1%

Best looking out of 10 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.2/ 10 harmony
Hailey Bieber front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

0.1 / 10

Top third26.63%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

0.0
Middle third36.89%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

0.3
Lower third36.48%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

7.2 / 10

Face width to height1.72

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

0.0
Bitemporal width81.55%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

10.0
Midface ratio0.97

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

6.0
9.8
Cheekbone height87.47%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

6.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt5.4 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

7.3
Eyebrow low setedness1.33

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

5.2
Eye aspect ratio2.82

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

10.0
Eye separation ratio45.11%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

6.2
One eye apart test1.14

Ideal 1.05 to 1.1

9.5
Eyebrow tilt6.5 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

0.0
Brow length to face width0.63

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.8

Nose

5.9 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle83.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

2.4
Deviation of IAA and JFA15.0 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.11

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

9.9
Intercanthal to nasal width1.12

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

7.4
Nose tip position1.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

7.7 / 10

Cupid's bow depth1.4 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

2.1
Chin to philtrum ratio2.35

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

10.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.52

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.38

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

1.5
Mouth to nose width1.55

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position1.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

6.1 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio10.31%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle14.7 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

2.3

Jaw, neck and lower face

8.9 / 10

Jaw slope139.9 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

8.7
Bigonial width83.87%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

10.0
Lower third proportion32.98%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

10.0
Jaw frontal angle98.0 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

5.7
Neck width81.75%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.1/ 10 harmony
Hailey Bieber side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

7.6 / 10

Browridge inclination20.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle142.4 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

10.0
Upper forehead slope4.0 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

2.8

Profile convexity

6.1 / 10

Z angle76.5 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

9.9
Total facial convexity141.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector-4.3 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

0.0
Facial convexity (glabella)165.6 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

7.2
Anterior facial depth72.7 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

5.3
Facial convexity (nasion)164.3 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

9.9
Facial depth to height1.48

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

6.5
Interior midface projection75.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

0.0

Nose

8.7 / 10

Nasal width to height0.61

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

0.6
Nasal projection0.60

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

10.0
Nasolabial angle95.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

9.9
Nasal tip angle130.7 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle128.2 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

10.0
Nasofacial angle31.7 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation22.6 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

10.0
Mid nose projection-0.4 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle36.9 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

7.6

Lips

9.9 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.0 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-1.9 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)0.8 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

9.6
Lower lip (S-line)0.9 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

9.6
Upper lip (E-line)4.4 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

9.9
Lower lip (E-line)3.0 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.4 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

9.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle130.7 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

10.0
Recession relative to Frankfort0.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

9.4
Gonial angle127.9 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

6.7
Mandibular plane angle24.5 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

7.8
Ramus to mandible ratio0.73

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

10.0
Gonion to mouth line13.1 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

9.9

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle101.8 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealSide view

Straight nasal bridge

10.0

This contributes to a refined profile due to the bridge running straight from root to tip.

Mid nose projection (side view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (Burstone)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just ahead of Burstone's line.

Lower lip (Burstone) (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lip-chin plane

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious lower profile due to the lips and chin falling in one plane on Holdaway's H-line.

Holdaway H line (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal nose-chin balance

10.0

This contributes to a balanced profile due to nose projection and chin position complementing each other.

Nasomental angle (side view)

idealSide view

Ideal lower lip position (E-line)

10.0

This contributes to balanced lips due to the lower lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.

Lower lip (E-line) (side view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.42

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.34

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.31

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

severeFront view

Short forehead

-0.30

The forehead takes up less of the face than ideal, which can make the lower features read heavy.

Top third (front view)

severeSide view

Recessed midface

-0.21

The midface falls away steeply under the eyes, which reads under-projected.

Interior midface projection (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.

Hailey Bieber's strongest and weakest features

Hailey Bieber scores 6.91 overall, and her profile outscores her front: 8.10 side against 6.18 front. Her lips, eyes and nose are her strongest features, and her costs come from a long midface, the jaw angle, a long lower third, a short upper third, the midface in profile and flat brows.

From the front, her temples are in band and her cheekbones sit high. Her eye openings are the ideal shape, and her nose tip sits level with her nostrils. Her chin is in proportion to her philtrum, her lips are full, her upper lip is the ideal length, her mouth is the right width for her nose, and her mouth corners sit well. Her ears sit flat and her jaw is the right width. In profile, her forehead leans back from the brow correctly, the step from her brow to her nose is in band, and her total facial convexity is in band. Her nose projection, tip angle, nasomental and nasofacial angles, tip rotation and mid nose projection are ideal. Her upper lip sits on the Burstone reference, her lower lip sits on the Burstone and E-line references, and her lips meet the Holdaway line. Her mentolabial angle, rear jaw length and jaw-to-neck angle are ideal.

Her largest cost is that her midface reads long for the width of her cheekbones, at 1.72 where 1.94 to 1.98 is ideal, which takes about 0.42 of a point. Her jaw angle differs from the angle from nose base to outer eye corners by 15.0 degrees, where 1.73 or less is ideal, which is her weakest single metric at 2.60 out of 10. Her lower third is long, at 36.5% of face height against 29.5 to 33.2%, and her upper third is short, at 26.6% against 30.4 to 33.6%. In profile, the line from her outer eye corner to her nostril crease drops steeply, so her midface carries her nose base forward less than ideal, at 75.1 degrees against 53 to 60. Her brows tilt less steeply than ideal, at 6.53 degrees against 10.2 to 15.5.