Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Gustavo "Vito" Basso - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Vogue Hommes, Armani Exchange, Tommy Hilfiger campaigns

Vito Basso's profile is the strong half, with lips resting right on the line, a sharp jaw corner and a nose that runs straight off a well-set brow into a clean chin. The nose turns on him from the side, upturned at the tip over a scooped bridge, and head-on the face reads narrow for its length with a long lower third, brows set high above the eyes and a softer line from jaw to neck.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Argentine
Eyes:
Hazel
Harmony:
8.2 / 10
Gustavo "Vito" Basso front portrait
Gustavo "Vito" Basso side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Gustavo "Vito" Basso's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

8.3

out of 10

Top 0.04%

Side view

8.0

out of 10

Top 0.2%

Best looking out of 1,000 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.3/ 10 harmony
Gustavo "Vito" Basso front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

9.2 / 10

Top third30.39%

Ideal 30 to 32

10.0
Middle third31.35%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.9
Lower third38.26%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

7.7

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.75

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width86.88%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Midface ratio1.01

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
0.0
Cheekbone height82.42%

Ideal 83 to 100

9.9

Eyes and brows

8.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.7 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness1.00

Ideal 0 to 0.45

2.8
Eye aspect ratio2.96

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio48.15%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

6.2
One eye apart test1.02

Ideal 0.95 to 1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt12.3 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

8.8
Brow length to face width0.65

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

8.7

Nose

7.0 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle88.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

10.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA6.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

5.4
Nose bridge to nose width2.32

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.15

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

10.0
Nose tip position-0.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

9.4

Mouth and lips

9.8 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.0 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

8.7
Chin to philtrum ratio2.13

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

9.9
Lower to upper lip ratio1.50

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

9.9
Lip fullness0.35

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.84

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

10.0
Mouth to nose width1.45

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

10.0
Mouth corner position0.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio9.39%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle11.4 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

10.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

9.1 / 10

Jaw slope140.4 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width87.11%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

9.9
Lower third proportion34.08%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

6.8
Jaw frontal angle95.4 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

9.0
Neck width98.79%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.8

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

8.0/ 10 harmony
Gustavo "Vito" Basso side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

10.0 / 10

Browridge inclination22.6 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Nasofrontal angle127.8 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope0.4 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

10.0

Profile convexity

8.5 / 10

Z angle82.9 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.8
Total facial convexity147.8 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

9.9
Orbital vector1.7 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)169.8 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

9.9
Anterior facial depth62.4 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

7.9
Facial convexity (nasion)166.2 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

9.9
Facial depth to height1.68

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection54.8 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

6.6 / 10

Nasal width to height0.68

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.68

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

9.9
Nasolabial angle100.8 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle129.7 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle132.6 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

9.8
Nasofacial angle31.1 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

10.0
Nose tip rotation33.9 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection-3.2 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

0.0
Frankfort tip angle47.1 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

0.0

Lips

10.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-4.6 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)-2.4 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)-0.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Lower lip (S-line)0.2 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

10.0
Upper lip (E-line)3.2 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

10.0
Lower lip (E-line)2.2 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

10.0
Holdaway H line0.3 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle145.3 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort11.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle119.1 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

10.0
Mandibular plane angle14.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.9
Ramus to mandible ratio0.61

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

9.9
Gonion to mouth line21.1 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

1.6 / 10

Submental cervical angle116.1 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

1.6

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal forehead width

10.0

This contributes to a pleasant forehead contour due to the forehead being neither too wide nor too narrow.

Bitemporal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal alar angle

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.

Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal nose width

10.0

This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base spanning just over the space between the eyes, per the classical guideline.

Intercanthal to nasal width (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip fullness

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lip height sitting in proportion with the width of the mouth.

Lip fullness (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.37

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

Long, narrow face shape

-0.23

The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

severeSide view

Over-rotated nose tip

-0.22

The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.

Nose tip rotation (side view)

severeFront view

Flared nose base

-0.16

The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

severeSide view

Effaced chin crease

-0.16

The crease between lip and chin is flat, which softens chin definition.

Mentolabial angle (side view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.