Celebrity analysis
How attractive is Gustavo "Vito" Basso - Facial Harmony Analysis
Model - Vogue Hommes, Armani Exchange, Tommy Hilfiger campaigns
Vito Basso's profile is the strong half, with lips resting right on the line, a sharp jaw corner and a nose that runs straight off a well-set brow into a clean chin. The nose turns on him from the side, upturned at the tip over a scooped bridge, and head-on the face reads narrow for its length with a long lower third, brows set high above the eyes and a softer line from jaw to neck.
- Gender:
- Male
- Ethnicity:
- Argentine
- Eyes:
- Hazel
- Harmony:
- 8.1 / 10
Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.
Signature tool
See my closest celebrity match
Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.
Harmony report
Gustavo "Vito" Basso's facial harmony
Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.
Overall harmony
8.1
out of 10
Top 0.08%
Front view
8.2
out of 10
Top 0.05%
Side view
8.0
out of 10
Top 0.2%
Best looking out of 1,000 people
Front harmony
Front analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Facial thirds
9.2 / 10
Face shape
6.0 / 10
Eyes and brows
7.8 / 10
Nose
7.0 / 10
Mouth and lips
9.8 / 10
Ears
10.0 / 10
Jaw, neck and lower face
9.1 / 10
Side harmony
Side analysis
34 available measurements from this image.
Analysis reference
Hover or tap a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.
Forehead and brow
10.0 / 10
Profile convexity
8.5 / 10
Nose
6.6 / 10
Lips
10.0 / 10
Chin and jaw
8.3 / 10
Neck
1.6 / 10
Biggest strengths
These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.
Ideal canthal tilt
10.0This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.
Lateral canthal tilt (front view)
Ideal upper lip position (E-line)
10.0This contributes to balanced lips due to the upper lip sitting classically just behind Ricketts' E-line.
Upper lip (E-line) (side view)
Ideal mouth-to-nose proportion
10.0This contributes to lower-face harmony due to the mouth being classically wider than the nose base.
Mouth to nose width (front view)
Ideal alar angle
10.0This contributes to midface harmony due to the nose base sitting in classical relation to the eye corners.
Ipsilateral alar angle (front view)
Ideal lip-chin plane
10.0This contributes to a harmonious lower profile due to the lips and chin falling in one plane on Holdaway's H-line.
Holdaway H line (side view)
Ideal mouth width
10.0This contributes to lower-face harmony due to the mouth sizing classically against the eyes.
Interpupillary to mouth width (front view)
Areas to improve
5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.
Narrow midface
-0.37The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.
Face width to height (front view)
Long, narrow face shape
-0.23The face is long for its width, which can read stretched.
Total facial width to height ratio (front view)
Over-rotated nose tip
-0.22The nostril axis points high, which can expose the nostrils.
Nose tip rotation (side view)
Flared nose base
-0.16The nose base is wide relative to the bridge, which can make the nostrils read flared.
Nose bridge to nose width (front view)
Effaced chin crease
-0.16The crease between lip and chin is flat, which softens chin definition.
Mentolabial angle (side view)
Celebrity lookalikes
Both profilesLoading the celebrity library...
Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.
Gustavo "Vito" Basso's strongest and weakest features
Gustavo "Vito" Basso scores 8.15 overall, with an even front and side (8.24 and 8.00). His lips, nose and eye area are his strongest features, and his costs come mainly from the length of the face.
From the front, his upper third and temples are in band, and his outer eye corners tilt correctly. The angle from the base of his nose to his outer eye corners is ideal, and his nose is sized correctly to the space between his eyes. His lips are full, his mouth is the right width for both his nose and his pupil distance, and his mouth corners sit well. His ears sit flat on both measures, and his jaw slope is ideal. In profile, the step from his brow to his nose, his forehead slope and orbital vector are in band, his nose angles are ideal, his lips sit on every reference line we measure (Burstone, S-line, E-line and Holdaway), his chin sits at the right depth, and his jaw corner angle and jaw corner height are ideal.
His largest cost is that his midface reads long for the width of his cheekbones, at 1.75 where 1.96 to 2 is ideal, which takes about 0.37 of a point, and his full face reads long too, at 1.41 against 1.34 to 1.37. In profile, his nose tip is rotated upward at 33.9 degrees against 11.5 to 21.5. The fold between his lower lip and chin is shallow, at 145.3 degrees against 111 to 127, and his face is deep for its height, at 1.68 against 1.3 to 1.44. From the front, his nose bridge reads narrow against the width of his nostrils, at 2.32 against 2.06 to 2.14.