Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Gisele Bündchen - Facial Harmony Analysis

Model - Victoria's Secret Angel, Vogue, Chanel and Louis Vuitton campaigns

Gisele Bündchen stacks an even forehead and midface on a compact frame, with high cheekbones and a mouth cut cleanly to the nose. The lower face is more severe, with lips set far behind the profile line, a long chin, a flat cupid's bow, ears that carry out and a jaw taper that does not echo the eyes.

Gender:
Female
Ethnicity:
German-Brazilian
Eyes:
Blue
Harmony:
7.0 / 10
Gisele Bündchen front portrait
Gisele Bündchen side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Gisele Bündchen's facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

7.1

out of 10

Top 4.4%

Side view

6.9

out of 10

Top 6.7%

Best looking out of 20 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

7.1/ 10 harmony
Gisele Bündchen front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

6.7 / 10

Top third31.48%

Ideal 30.4 to 33.6

10.0
Middle third33.05%

Ideal 32.2 to 34.8

10.0
Lower third35.47%

Ideal 29.5 to 33.2

0.0

Face shape

9.5 / 10

Face width to height1.90

Ideal 1.94 to 1.98

8.5
Bitemporal width87.34%

Ideal 80.1 to 85.7

8.8
Midface ratio1.03

Ideal 1.03 to 1.06

10.0
10.0
Cheekbone height85.05%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.9 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.1 deg

Ideal 7.07 to 8.36

9.3
Eyebrow low setedness0.93

Ideal 0.48 to 0.94

10.0
Eye aspect ratio2.73

Ideal 2.77 to 3.36

9.9
Eye separation ratio45.55%

Ideal 46.5 to 47.5

8.3
One eye apart test1.01

Ideal 0.95 to 1

9.9
Eyebrow tilt17.4 deg

Ideal 10.2 to 15.5

5.5
Brow length to face width0.62

Ideal 0.64 to 0.73

9.5

Nose

6.5 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle84.8 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

8.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA18.2 deg

Ideal 0.1 to 1.73

0.0
Nose bridge to nose width2.36

Ideal 2.14 to 2.22

6.4
Intercanthal to nasal width1.11

Ideal 0.93 to 1.05

8.2
Nose tip position1.2 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

10.0

Mouth and lips

5.6 / 10

Cupid's bow depth0.8 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

0.0
Chin to philtrum ratio2.86

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.36

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

8.1
Lip fullness0.36

Ideal 0.342 to 0.418

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.88

Ideal 0.74 to 0.78

0.9
Mouth to nose width1.58

Ideal 1.52 to 1.6

10.0
Mouth corner position-0.0 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

9.9

Ears

5.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio11.35%

Ideal 8 to 12

10.0
Ear protrusion angle17.2 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

0.0

Jaw, neck and lower face

7.5 / 10

Jaw slope139.1 deg

Ideal 142.2 to 144.3

7.4
Bigonial width83.33%

Ideal 83.7 to 88.4

9.9
Lower third proportion30.93%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

9.9
Jaw frontal angle102.9 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width79.74%

Ideal 72.5 to 81.4

10.0

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

6.9/ 10 harmony
Gisele Bündchen side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

9.3 / 10

Browridge inclination15.9 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Nasofrontal angle136.3 deg

Ideal 139.8 to 150.6

7.8
Upper forehead slope8.9 deg

Ideal 6.8 to 8.97

10.0

Profile convexity

6.2 / 10

Z angle84.8 deg

Ideal 76.6 to 80

0.0
Total facial convexity146.0 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

10.0
Orbital vector1.2 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

10.0
Facial convexity (glabella)173.6 deg

Ideal 167.6 to 174.1

10.0
Anterior facial depth68.0 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.9
Facial convexity (nasion)170.5 deg

Ideal 160.5 to 163.8

0.0
Facial depth to height1.56

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

0.0
Interior midface projection61.1 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

9.8

Nose

6.8 / 10

Nasal width to height0.71

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.67

Ideal 0.55 to 0.62

7.6
Nasolabial angle103.5 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

10.0
Nasal tip angle134.2 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

10.0
Nasomental angle133.3 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

7.4
Nasofacial angle27.6 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

0.0
Nose tip rotation18.3 deg

Ideal 19.8 to 29.9

9.3
Mid nose projection1.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

7.0
Frankfort tip angle29.5 deg

Ideal 39.8 to 47.3

0.0

Lips

6.0 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-1.4 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

9.9
Lower lip (Burstone)-0.8 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

10.0
Upper lip (S-line)3.9 mm

Ideal -1.43 to 0.37

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)2.2 mm

Ideal -1.28 to 0.52

1.0
Upper lip (E-line)8.1 mm

Ideal -0.63 to 3.97

1.3
Lower lip (E-line)4.5 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

9.9
Holdaway H line-0.0 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

10.0

Chin and jaw

8.3 / 10

Mentolabial angle144.7 deg

Ideal 118.1 to 134.2

0.9
Recession relative to Frankfort3.1 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

10.0
Gonial angle123.1 deg

Ideal 117.7 to 124.9

10.0
Mandibular plane angle18.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.56

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

8.9
Gonion to mouth line16.2 mm

Ideal 13.7 to 29.8

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle97.0 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal upper third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the forehead taking up neither too little nor too much of the face.

Top third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal middle third

10.0

This contributes to balanced facial thirds due to the midface holding its classical share between brow and nose.

Middle third (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal midface ratio

10.0

This contributes to a harmonious midface due to eye spacing and midface length sitting in proportion.

Midface ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal brow height

10.0

This contributes to a defined eye area due to the brows sitting at a classical height above the eyes.

Eyebrow low setedness (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Midface-jaw mismatch

-0.35

The midface and jaw taper along visibly different lines, which reads as disharmony between the upper and lower face.

Deviation of IAA and JFA (front view)

severeFront view

Protruding ears

-0.26

The ears angle out from the head beyond the typical range, which draws attention from the face.

Ear protrusion angle (front view)

severeFront view

Flat Cupid's bow

-0.26

The bow is shallow, which flattens the upper lip's definition.

Cupid's bow depth (front view)

severeFront view

Long chin or short philtrum

-0.23

The chin is tall for the philtrum above it, which can make the chin dominate the lower face.

Chin to philtrum ratio (front view)

severeFront view

Long lower face

-0.22

The lower face takes up more than its classical share, which can make the chin and jaw dominate the face.

Lower third (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.