Celebrity analysis

How attractive is Gigachad (Ernest Khalimov) - Facial Harmony Analysis

Internet meme - Sleek'N'Tears, the photo project of Krista Sudmalis

Gigachad is built on the jaw and midface, with a knife-edge jaw-to-neck line, deep cheekbones and a nose set at the right depth and angle on the profile. The proportions are where it slips, with a short forehead over a long lower face, a flat run from brow to chin and lips carried well ahead of the line.

Gender:
Male
Ethnicity:
Caucasian
Eyes:
Brown
Harmony:
5.8 / 10
Gigachad (Ernest Khalimov) front portrait
Gigachad (Ernest Khalimov) side portrait

Analysis by RateMyFaceAI, using AI-placed, hand-verified landmarks on these photographs. Photo angle, expression, and placement affect the result. Read our methodology.

Signature tool

See my closest celebrity match

Upload a front and side photo, place the pins, and every profile in the library is ranked by the measurements you share with it.

Harmony report

Gigachad (Ernest Khalimov)'s facial harmony

Every pin on these photos verified by hand, then scored the same way your own analysis is. These scores describe shape and ratios only.

Front view

5.9

out of 10

Top 31%

Side view

5.5

out of 10

Top 42%

Best looking out of 3 people

Front harmony

Front analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.9/ 10 harmony
Gigachad (Ernest Khalimov) front reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Facial thirds

3.3 / 10

Top third25.90%

Ideal 30 to 32

0.0
Middle third33.73%

Ideal 31.4 to 33.4

9.9
Lower third40.36%

Ideal 33.9 to 37

0.0

Face shape

6.0 / 10

Face width to height1.74

Ideal 1.96 to 2

0.0
Bitemporal width79.26%

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Midface ratio0.96

Ideal 0.97 to 1

9.9
10.0
Cheekbone height90.10%

Ideal 83 to 100

10.0

Eyes and brows

8.0 / 10

Lateral canthal tilt6.6 deg

Ideal 6 to 7.7

10.0
Eyebrow low setedness0.94

Ideal 0 to 0.45

4.1
Eye aspect ratio3.00

Ideal 3 to 3.5

9.9
Eye separation ratio46.78%

Ideal 45.7 to 46.8

10.0
One eye apart test1.12

Ideal 0.95 to 1

2.3
Eyebrow tilt7.1 deg

Ideal 6.5 to 11

10.0
Brow length to face width0.68

Ideal 0.69 to 0.76

9.9

Nose

4.4 / 10

Ipsilateral alar angle81.7 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Deviation of IAA and JFA2.6 deg

Ideal 0 to 2.5

9.9
Nose bridge to nose width1.84

Ideal 2.06 to 2.14

0.0
Intercanthal to nasal width1.03

Ideal 1.04 to 1.16

9.9
Nose tip position3.8 mm

Ideal 0 to 3

2.2

Mouth and lips

8.1 / 10

Cupid's bow depth2.1 mm

Ideal 2.3 to 4

9.4
Chin to philtrum ratio2.77

Ideal 2.15 to 2.45

0.0
Lower to upper lip ratio1.81

Ideal 1.55 to 1.85

10.0
Lip fullness0.32

Ideal 0.297 to 0.363

10.0
Interpupillary to mouth width0.77

Ideal 0.83 to 0.87

7.1
Mouth to nose width1.41

Ideal 1.42 to 1.5

9.9
Mouth corner position1.5 mm

Ideal 0 to 4

10.0

Ears

10.0 / 10

Ear protrusion ratio7.69%

Ideal 8 to 12

9.9
Ear protrusion angle9.9 deg

Ideal 10 to 11.5

9.9

Jaw, neck and lower face

5.2 / 10

Jaw slope140.7 deg

Ideal 140 to 142.5

10.0
Bigonial width94.99%

Ideal 87.5 to 91.5

6.1
Lower third proportion28.42%

Ideal 31 to 33.5

0.0
Jaw frontal angle79.1 deg

Ideal 86.5 to 92.5

0.0
Neck width91.54%

Ideal 92 to 98

9.9

Side harmony

Side analysis

34 available measurements from this image.

5.5/ 10 harmony
Gigachad (Ernest Khalimov) side reference used for facial harmony analysis

Analysis reference

Hover a score to see its measurement drawn on this image.

Forehead and brow

8.3 / 10

Browridge inclination24.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

9.5
Nasofrontal angle123.1 deg

Ideal 116 to 128

10.0
Upper forehead slope4.8 deg

Ideal 0 to 2

5.3

Profile convexity

6.2 / 10

Z angle77.0 deg

Ideal 78 to 82

9.6
Total facial convexity158.1 deg

Ideal 140 to 147

0.0
Orbital vector1.0 mm

Ideal 1 to 10

9.9
Facial convexity (glabella)178.2 deg

Ideal 170 to 175

4.0
Anterior facial depth63.3 deg

Ideal 64.5 to 67.5

9.4
Facial convexity (nasion)176.2 deg

Ideal 163 to 166

0.0
Facial depth to height1.55

Ideal 1.3 to 1.44

7.0
Interior midface projection59.3 deg

Ideal 53 to 60

10.0

Nose

6.2 / 10

Nasal width to height0.68

Ideal 0.67 to 0.83

10.0
Nasal projection0.65

Ideal 0.59 to 0.67

10.0
Nasolabial angle88.1 deg

Ideal 97 to 114

8.6
Nasal tip angle128.1 deg

Ideal 128.5 to 138.5

9.9
Nasomental angle142.1 deg

Ideal 126 to 131

0.0
Nasofacial angle27.3 deg

Ideal 31 to 35

3.1
Nose tip rotation27.4 deg

Ideal 11.5 to 21.5

0.0
Mid nose projection0.1 mm

Ideal -1.25 to 0.5

10.0
Frankfort tip angle44.2 deg

Ideal 32 to 38

4.4

Lips

3.5 / 10

Upper lip (Burstone)-2.2 mm

Ideal -5.2 to -1.8

10.0
Lower lip (Burstone)0.3 mm

Ideal -3.2 to -0.8

7.3
Upper lip (S-line)3.9 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Lower lip (S-line)4.5 mm

Ideal -0.4 to 1.4

0.0
Upper lip (E-line)9.1 mm

Ideal 1.2 to 5.8

0.0
Lower lip (E-line)8.1 mm

Ideal 1.1 to 4.4

0.0
Holdaway H line1.9 mm

Ideal -0.2 to 1.2

7.2

Chin and jaw

5.0 / 10

Mentolabial angle143.0 deg

Ideal 111 to 127

0.0
Recession relative to Frankfort30.4 mm

Ideal 1.5 to 15

3.3
Gonial angle111.3 deg

Ideal 115 to 121

3.0
Mandibular plane angle21.4 deg

Ideal 15 to 22

10.0
Ramus to mandible ratio0.54

Ideal 0.62 to 0.75

3.8
Gonion to mouth line26.5 mm

Ideal 15 to 45

10.0

Neck

10.0 / 10

Submental cervical angle94.2 deg

Ideal 94 to 106

10.0

Biggest strengths

These measurements sit in or right beside their ideal ranges and carry your score.

idealFront view

Ideal face shape

10.0

This contributes to overall harmony due to face length and width sitting in balanced proportion.

Total facial width to height ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal cheekbone height

10.0

This contributes to a well-supported midface due to the widest point of the cheekbones sitting high.

Cheekbone height (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal canthal tilt

10.0

This contributes to an attractive eye area due to the outer corners sitting gently above the inner corners.

Lateral canthal tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eye spacing

10.0

This contributes to a balanced midface due to the eyes sitting neither too close together nor too far apart.

Eye separation ratio (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal eyebrow tilt

10.0

This contributes to a lively eye area due to the brows rising gently toward their peaks.

Eyebrow tilt (front view)

idealFront view

Ideal lip ratio

10.0

This contributes to attractive lips due to the lower lip being classically fuller than the upper.

Lower to upper lip ratio (front view)

Areas to improve

5 features stand out - fixing what is fixable here moves your score the most.

severeFront view

Narrow midface

-0.46

The face is narrow for its midface height, which stretches the center of the face vertically.

Face width to height (front view)

severeFront view

High-set mouth

-0.36

The mouth sits close under the nose, which lengthens the chin's share of the lower face.

Lower third proportion (front view)

severeFront view

Short forehead

-0.33

The forehead takes up less of the face than ideal, which can make the lower features read heavy.

Top third (front view)

severeSide view

Concave profile

-0.25

The profile runs flat to concave at the nose base, which can read as a prominent chin or flat midface.

Facial convexity (nasion) (side view)

severeFront view

Wide nose bridge

-0.24

The bridge is wide relative to the nose base, which can make the nose read heavy at the top.

Nose bridge to nose width (front view)

Celebrity lookalikes

Both profiles

Loading the celebrity library...

Percentiles are modelled estimates centred on an average face at 5.0, not measured population data. Results depend on precise landmark placement, camera angle, and image quality.